UPDATED Post-to-Like Ratio: Where do you stand?

5-Star Finger

Apex predator of the political forum biome
Lifetime Member
2222 being on the list, primarily bc he was the Official Apologizer of All Thing Butteriffic, and bc three or four fvkking fools liked every bit of 3star 115th ranked offense loving bullshyt he posted is a shamesty.
And yet...he has a higher ratio than me. Pretty kewl...:flush:
 

Captain Sasquatch

Mr. SQ, the Sashole
BANNED
If I could go back and delete my old PF posts, two things would happen.

One, my ratio would be well over 100%. And two, the PF would lose almost all of its rationality and level headedness. :grin:
 

AlexDaGator

The Hammer of Thor
Lifetime Member
There has been like inflation. That's why so many new posters are ranked so high.

If you just looked at Queenie's posts for the last couple of years, I bet she'd be top 10. Ditto for Zambo, Brad, Pasty, and even Ox himself.

We founding members created a lot of posts when likes were few and far between. It's bringing down our average.

I'm not suggesting you increase the value of older likes or anything. Like Swonkey said, it's the internet. Relax.

I'm only offering an explanation for the results you're seeing.


Alex.
 

Bernardo de la Paz

Florida Victorious Member
Lifetime Member
I'm generally disappointed.
giphy.gif
 

Woodroe

Sir Knowitall
Lifetime Member
I don't encourage posting. I encourage quality posting. I'm generally disappointed.
I love your logic and agree wholeheartedly. Except that I am specifically disappointed more often than generally. I could name some names. Hell, half the time it's me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    Top