Huddersfield
Active Member
- Nov 10, 2017
- 28
- 21
I would assume so. I'd also be willing to bet no one knew this until recently.why?
Terms of his contract with 49's?
Oh I am sure it was addressed and passed through multiple levels. The pres is the final sign off. I imagine there's a governance doc out there that will show you the levels of approval.Since that’s always been the 800 pound gorilla in the room with a Kelly hire, it makes no sense not to have addressed that up front before the really heavy lifting got started. If there are doubts about it at this late date, that’s troubling.
intersting.I would assume so. I'd also be willing to bet no one knew this until recently.
Just gonna throw this out there. If we happen to miss on our top 2 targets, and settle for a real second tier guy(Strong, Mullen, Taggart), while in the process, losing at minimum our best recruit and hopeful savior QB...you could make a valid argument that unless our move at mid season saved us a legit 6-8 million, we may have been better served giving JM another season.
This is in no way an endorsement of the clown we just fired. But just to keep Corrall and the others in the mix, it may have been worth it because I’m not sure those second tier guys are better by enough to lock ourselves into another 3-4 years of stagnant play. Either way we’re screwed.
Speculation by people who don't know ****. People outside looking in.What the hell was all the talk about the contract negotiations previous to this supposed “interview” then? Everyone and their mother seemed to have the inside track on the negotiating to CK’s contract. You mean to tell me for more than two weeks, last night was the first time he’s been interviewed? And if it was a good interview, with everything that’s already transpired, the contract deal never got thrown into the situation?
I’d be willing to bet that it isn’t true.I would assume so. I'd also be willing to bet no one knew this until recently.
I’d be willing to bet that it isn’t true.
ink by now it's clear our boys went up to NH
For 5 million dollars I would wait a week too. This makes yesterday more understandable.
The wrinkle is that you telegraph also-ran to your other potentials in a seller’s market. Doesn’t your scenario assume an agreement in principle?Oh I am sure it was addressed and passed through multiple levels. The pres is the final sign off. I imagine there's a governance doc out there that will show you the levels of approval.
I've been associated with about 4 large contracts/purchases each taking several months of due diligence. The CEO is consulted along the way. Once the details are ironed out the CEO steps in and does the last blessing face to face with some pretty pointed questions.
No, but if we miss on the good ones, keeping Shannon as interim for a year with no buyout might make sense.Not disagreeing that they are better. But are they enough of a step up to justify this? Sucking is sucking. But again, just throwing it out there. I may just be going insane from all of this.