- Aug 12, 2014
- 9,291
- 6,803
I have heard recently multiple college and NBA teams will be trying to get Billy this offseason. Hope Billy doesn't leave us after a NIT (doubtful) bid.
I just don't see that happening. Whered you hear thatLeeForThree;n192357 said:I have heard recently multiple college and NBA teams will be trying to get Billy this offseason. Hope Billy doesn't leave us after a NIT (doubtful) bid.
Take this somewhere else dudeT REX;n192385 said:I don't see anyone beating Kentucky. That team is damn good and battle tested. We are looking at history. 40-0. Possibly the best team in college basketball history. Certainly the most talented. Coaching is MEH
t-gator;n192394 said:Take this somewhere else dude
T REX;n192385 said:I don't see anyone beating Kentucky. That team is damn good and battle tested. We are looking at history. 40-0. Possibly the best team in college basketball history. Certainly the most talented. Coaching is MEH
At 40-0 they would still not be in the top 10 of all time teams. They wouldn't be in the top 2 of UK teams. Record...sure, but not even a top 40 schedule and really terrible offensive games, coupled with many many close games vs far inferior competition does not make them the best ever.T REX;n192385 said:I don't see anyone beating Kentucky. That team is damn good and battle tested. We are looking at history. 40-0. Possibly the best team in college basketball history. Certainly the most talented. Coaching is MEH
LeeForThree;n192448 said:At 40-0 they would still not be in the top 10 of all time teams. They wouldn't be in the top 2 of UK teams. Record...sure, but not even a top 40 schedule and really terrible offensive games, coupled with many many close games vs far inferior competition does not make them the best ever.
It's not hate. It's objective. If FSU went undefeated this year in football would they have been the greatest team ever...hell no. A weak schedule helps a lot. If UK played Dukes schedule or Wisconsins I'd say they lose 3-5 games. Not the greatest ever. They are good but I can name Ten teams over the years that are better than this year's uk team. Not more successful but better. Not my problem you love a uk team that wouldn't beat our Gator team from last season 2 times let alone Uks 2012 team. Our 2007 team, Uks 1996 team, Indiana undefeated team, and so on. I haven't seen a weaker college basketball season as a whole in a long time. Very few teams can score or have talent like 10 yrs ago let alone 20 yrs ago. UK is a product of that and an easy ass schedule, so yes, if they go 40-0 still not top 10 alltime. Definitely a top 5 season in terms of success, but not an all time great team.T REX;n192454 said:Huh? Close games? If they go 40-0 in the modern era that's insane and puts them in rarefied company. Not in the top ten of all-time? Your hate is making you sound ridiculous. They have like 5-6 NBA players. They are going to roll through the NCAAs. They haven't lost and they aren't going to.
LeeForThree;n192481 said:It's not hate. It's objective. If FSU went undefeated this year in football would they have been the greatest team ever...hell no. A weak schedule helps a lot. If UK played Dukes schedule or Wisconsins I'd say they lose 3-5 games. Not the greatest ever. They are good but I can name Ten teams over the years that are better than this year's uk team. Not more successful but better. Not my problem you love a uk team that wouldn't beat our Gator team from last season 2 times let alone Uks 2012 team. Our 2007 team, Uks 1996 team, Indiana undefeated team, and so on. I haven't seen a weaker college basketball season as a whole in a long time. Very few teams can score or have talent like 10 yrs ago let alone 20 yrs ago. UK is a product of that and an easy ass schedule, so yes, if they go 40-0 still not top 10 alltime. Definitely a top 5 season in terms of success, but not an all time great team.
Ha...Uks schedule is ranked 41st...that patheticT REX;n192488 said:I love this UK team? Apparently you can't read either because I loathe UK and Calipari. And that's why my objectivity is real and yours is a joke. I can feel your UK hate dripping from your posts. If and when UK goes 40-0 we can talk again about placement among the all-time greats. I hope we don't. My girl went to Nova law so I will be cheering for the Wildcats sans a UF team to cheer.
Your talk of talent is hilarious. UK is stacked. Did you see UK's OOC wins? Because they played and beat...not just beat but destroyed some great teams. The SEC sucks. Let's see how they do in the NCAAs. I would love for you to come in here and make me eat my words.
LeeForThree;n192489 said:Ha...Uks schedule is ranked 41st...that pathetic
Talk about reading comprehension...I never said anything about uks talent. But let's talk. Talent. Florida in 2007 was more talented by a lot for the starting 5 positions. So in my opinion, yes they are not as talented as past teams. They may have more talent, but not more quality talent. WCS, KAT, lyles, Harrisons are barely a over d league level. Dakari, Booker, and ulis may never start a game in the NBA let alone make it to a second contract.
I'm not using NBA careers, just looking back at the college seasons they played.T REX;n192490 said:Unfortunately, you are using NBA careers as a measuring stick and you'll need to see where these kids land and how they develop. Too early to tell if that's your measuring stick. Lots of 20/20 hindsight. I think that changes the narrative a little. Looking back on the 04's in the moment no one knew how good these guys really were...now? That's a great great team with NBA talent.
40-0 is still 40-0. They need to do it first then let's talk. Your flippant attitude towards a team that goes 40-0 is pretty funny. Sorry, I just don't think you are backing up your opinion with very much outside of UK hate.
t-gator;n192492 said:Put your bonar for Kentucky away. The 04's would wax this Kentucky teams ass. We may not have been as deep but the quality of players was better. Noah and Horford have both been nba all stars and brewer is a very good rotation player. Kentucky has one player with that potential( towns). Wcs will be a rotational player at best. Nobody else on that roster looks like they'll ever sniff any meaningful nba minutes. Not to mention how weak the field is compared to 07'.