I was actually wondering if that's why the helmet flexed... Absorbing some of the impact?But hey, the equipment is better now, right??
But hey, the equipment is better now, right??
Those old Riddell buckets we used to play in were hard as a rock and the old web suspension did nothing to help absorb the force of the contact. Today's helmets are far, far superior in terms of injury protection, but not 100% efficient by any means. Head up, hat on the ball was always a good technique for not only a sure tackle, but also to minimize injuries to both ball carrier and tackler.Actually, the more I look at that slow-mo video of the helmet "bending," it might be good that it did so that the impact of the hit could be absorbed by the helmet moving. Kinda like a "safer barrier" wall......
I've been saying for years, we need to go back to leather or no helmets at all.But hey, the equipment is better now, right??
If you have sons with dreams of playing football, don't let their mother see that video......
Rugby players are not seeing these injuries. You know it would hurt you as well.I've been saying for years, we need to go back to leather or no helmets at all.
Rugby also has some pretty strict rules about how you are allowed to tackle. It's not really the same thing.Rugby players are not seeing these injuries. You know it would hurt you as well.
CTE risks may warrant this. If not, we can say goodbye to football soon.Rugby also has some pretty strict rules about how you are allowed to tackle. It's not really the same thing.
That **** is going to get a HUGE fine and hopefully suspension for that...and deservedly so. Watching it in real time I didn't think it was going to be that bad but then the replays were shown and you could see he was 100% head hunting on that one
Are you kidding? Did you watch all the replays as well during the game? That was intentionalYou know they actually play the game in real time not slo-mo? You do understand they were playing tackle football? Perhaps you should have stayed with your real time conclusion?
Are you kidding? Did you watch all the replays as well during the game? That was intentional
So you think targeting the head of a player that is being held up by another player is just playing tackle football?Of course he intentionally hit him, that is why I wondered if you understood they were playing TACKLE football.
So you think targeting the head of a player that is being held up by another player is just playing tackle football?