- Jun 11, 2014
- 34,962
- 33,097
Founding Member
It was an exaggeration but there are certainly many who feel its secondary. You could argue that great recruits generally concentrate around great coaching which would add nuance to the “teams with higher average recruiting classes win 82.6% of the time” argument.
Oh! Of course, no spectrum at all. Just a Manchean "good" or "bad".Bad coaches get fired, for everybody else it’s all about the Jimmie & Joe’s.
Statistically there is very little spectrum.Oh! Of course, no spectrum at all. Just a Manchean "good" or "bad".
Captain Windmill Tilter.Oh! Of course, no spectrum at all. Just a Manchean "good" or "bad".
Good point. Saban and Mushchump are close.Statistically there is very little spectrum.
Like I said, bad coaches get fired.Good point. Saban and Mushchump are close.
Will your data also support us looking into the length of tenure at a given school for the head coach? I have a theory that the longer a coach is at a school, the higher his win-loss percentage is likely to be. I’m thinking that it could be an accurate predictor 80%+ of the time.
Bravo!FSU's Drivers Ed class can only use the university car on M,W,Th. The Sex-ed class needs the back seat on T, F.