FI-RE Mul-len, clap, clap, clap-clap-clap: 2-7 in last 9 P5 games; FSU 3-8

Ray Finkle

Fallen Mod
Lifetime Member
Jul 28, 2014
4,473
3,727
I broke out of prison, did a few oversized rails, and tucked my balls back to convince some dude in skinny jeans to use his computer just to say Dan is a got dayum joke. Who cares if Emory knows the whole playbook? My 9 year old daughter knows my humor but just doesn't say anything funny. My 8 month old son can't say a word but he does stupid chit all the time that cracks me up. If I need a laugh I know who I'm going with. Give me the fat window licker who always tries to crap himself during a diaper change because it's funny and cracks him up. TopBillin said one thing right when he said EJ was going to be playin for some tiny school with AR playing like this. Well, it would be right if Lt. Dan would realize he has no legs on this one and stand behind the one who doesn't turn the ball over, scores consistently, and excites the entire fan base. But he's a dipchit and the shidder is full because it contains him and his coaching staff. Dan is clearly a laces in kind of guy, and he should die of gonorrhea and rot in hell.
 

t-gator

Founding Member
too sexy for my shirt
Lifetime Member
Jun 13, 2014
15,741
18,135
Founding Member
I'm on the AR train, but even I know this is an exaggeration.
Ok. Take away AR's 3 touchdowns the score would be 21-20 vs usf. And that's with usf conceding pretty early in the 4th. FAU would look like 21-14 without AR's production.
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,480
110,926
Founding Member
I broke out of prison, did a few oversized rails, and tucked my balls back to convince some dude in skinny jeans to use his computer just to say Dan is a got dayum joke. Who cares if Emory knows the whole playbook? My 9 year old daughter knows my humor but just doesn't say anything funny. My 8 month old son can't say a word but he does stupid chit all the time that cracks me up. If I need a laugh I know who I'm going with. Give me the fat window licker who always tries to crap himself during a diaper change because it's funny and cracks him up. TopBillin said one thing right when he said EJ was going to be playin for some tiny school with AR playing like this. Well, it would be right if Lt. Dan would realize he has no legs on this one and stand behind the one who doesn't turn the ball over, scores consistently, and excites the entire fan base. But he's a dipchit and the shidder is full because it contains him and his coaching staff. Dan is clearly a laces in kind of guy, and he should die of gonorrhea and rot in hell.
HOF post
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,480
110,926
Founding Member
Donk you got-em drinking your cool aid, sounds like a bunch winos sitting around *****ing about the MD 20 20 they be drinking when they could be drinking Thunderbird.
I don't know what the fuchs that means but you get a like anyway.
 

MidwestChomp

Fun was the goal and we hit the bullseye
Lifetime Member
Sep 15, 2014
10,297
14,032
I broke out of prison, did a few oversized rails, and tucked my balls back to convince some dude in skinny jeans to use his computer just to say Dan is a got dayum joke. Who cares if Emory knows the whole playbook? My 9 year old daughter knows my humor but just doesn't say anything funny. My 8 month old son can't say a word but he does stupid chit all the time that cracks me up. If I need a laugh I know who I'm going with. Give me the fat window licker who always tries to crap himself during a diaper change because it's funny and cracks him up. TopBillin said one thing right when he said EJ was going to be playin for some tiny school with AR playing like this. Well, it would be right if Lt. Dan would realize he has no legs on this one and stand behind the one who doesn't turn the ball over, scores consistently, and excites the entire fan base. But he's a dipchit and the shidder is full because it contains him and his coaching staff. Dan is clearly a laces in kind of guy, and he should die of gonorrhea and rot in hell.


you used Slevin's computer?
 

soflagator

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Sep 4, 2014
21,373
79,876
Isn't missing a read and then making up for it by scoring a sensational TD making a great play? What a toolbag this guy is.

My biggest issue with Mullen's demeanor when being asked these questions is that this controversy is entirely self inflicted. For starters, the fact that it took an injury to Franks to get a record setting QB on the field was completely his call. That was less than 2 years ago. Now, I've defended his logic because of his offense and the fact that FF had the body type to be a better fit. Coaches are generally drawn to potential and arm strength. But again, it was his call, and it was the wrong one. Own it and accept some natural hesitancy to think you have it all figured out.

But more than that, it's been his insistence on rotating them in games, as early as Q1 that's made it worse. I truly believe if Jones had been allowed to stay in against FAU throughout the entire first half and maybe into Q3, he would've developed a better rhythm, even if only in the run game, and we score 21-28 points by halftime. There's a reason coaches, have always done that, especially with a new starter. Give him all the first team reps, let him find his groove. Then, you let the backups play. Not only does it give you a better sample size of your starter, it also helps to pour water on the idea that the backup is better if and when he lights it up, because it's a different setting. If Richardson is playing mostly scrubs in late Q3 and Q4, rather than starters in a tight game in the first half, then you're not seeing a true apples/apples comparison. You can argue that the backup was in mop up duty against a tired defense and/or 3rd stringers of an overmatched opponent. But we chose not to do that in both weeks. So we're all watching AR go out and dominate the same defensive players that EJ just threw INT's to or went 3-and-out against. This whole scenario is on Mullen and his mishandling of things.
 

oxrageous

Founding Member
It's Good to be King
Administrator
Jun 5, 2014
37,042
98,104
Founding Member
My biggest issue with Mullen's demeanor when being asked these questions is that this controversy is entirely self inflicted. For starters, the fact that it took an injury to Franks to get a record setting QB on the field was completely his call. That was less than 2 years ago. Now, I've defended his logic because of his offense and the fact that FF had the body type to be a better fit. Coaches are generally drawn to potential and arm strength. But again, it was his call, and it was the wrong one. Own it and accept some natural hesitancy to think you have it all figured out.

But more than that, it's been his insistence on rotating them in games, as early as Q1 that's made it worse. I truly believe if Jones had been allowed to stay in against FAU throughout the entire first half and maybe into Q3, he would've developed a better rhythm, even if only in the run game, and we score 21-28 points by halftime. There's a reason coaches, have always done that, especially with a new starter. Give him all the first team reps, let him find his groove. Then, you let the backups play. Not only does it give you a better sample size of your starter, it also helps to pour water on the idea that the backup is better if and when he lights it up, because it's a different setting. If Richardson is playing mostly scrubs in late Q3 and Q4, rather than starters in a tight game in the first half, then you're not seeing a true apples/apples comparison. You can argue that the backup was in mop up duty against a tired defense and/or 3rd stringers of an overmatched opponent. But we chose not to do that in both weeks. So we're all watching AR go out and dominate the same defensive players that EJ just threw INT's to or went 3-and-out against. This whole scenario is on Mullen and his mishandling of things.
Good post. I got to watch the last game with oxking, and I remember asking him why Mullen would play AR at all. If Emory is your guy, why stick Richardson in there? He's CREATED this damn controversy. He knew Emory needed all the reps he could get.
 

G8trwood

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Nov 29, 2015
4,089
6,049
Sometimes an idiot savant is only halfway there……. The play was perfect, had to be, my way! F that touchdown crap.

#daydrinking
 

Sec14Gator

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Oct 8, 2017
2,169
5,581
New level of arrogance. "I don't go down to Shands and tell the surgeons how to operate"


Well Dan, if twice in the surgeon's career he chose to ignore a giant tumor instead of cutting it out early and only did so when the patient had already lost an entire leg, then yes I would be questioning them if they are doing surgery on someone I care about. See Dak and Trask, each of whom you waited to play until forced to do so.

Well, keeping the analogy Dan chose, now the symptoms are again obvious and the pompous surgeon is yet again telling us we don't need to do anything about it. In real life, surgeons get questioned more seriously and strenuously than this fool.
 
Last edited:

soflagator

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Sep 4, 2014
21,373
79,876
Well Dan, if twice in the surgeon's career he chose to ignore a giant tumor instead of cutting it out early and only did so when the patient had already lost an entire leg, then yes I would be questioning them if they are doing surgery on someone I care about. See Dak and Trask, each of who you waited to play until forced to do so.

Well, keeping the analogy Dan chose, now the symptoms are again obvious and the pompous surgeon is yet again telling us we don't need to do anything about it. In real life, surgeons get questioned more seriously and strenuously than this fool.

There were 7 residents in the observation area. Too loud to focus.
 

UFHealthGator

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Nov 12, 2017
1,602
3,947
New level of arrogance. "I don't go down to Shands and tell the surgeons how to operate"



If a surgeon is proven incompetent, everyone questions their judgement. He has already demonstrated that he is incompetent at putting the best QB on the field, and it took a catastrophic injury to his starter before he put the backup who ended up being a heisman candidate. Did he ever admit that KT was better than FF?
 

Detroitgator

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jul 15, 2014
28,595
47,523
New level of arrogance. "I don't go down to Shands and tell the surgeons how to operate"

Very interesting at the 10:20 mark... someone finally asks him about the influence of his wife, Dr. Megan Jill Biden Mullen... he dodges the clear intent of the question.
 

bradgator2

Founding Member
Rioting
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
9,614
25,553
Founding Member
My biggest issue with Mullen's demeanor when being asked these questions is that this controversy is entirely self inflicted. For starters, the fact that it took an injury to Franks to get a record setting QB on the field was completely his call. That was less than 2 years ago. Now, I've defended his logic because of his offense and the fact that FF had the body type to be a better fit. Coaches are generally drawn to potential and arm strength. But again, it was his call, and it was the wrong one. Own it and accept some natural hesitancy to think you have it all figured out.

But more than that, it's been his insistence on rotating them in games, as early as Q1 that's made it worse. I truly believe if Jones had been allowed to stay in against FAU throughout the entire first half and maybe into Q3, he would've developed a better rhythm, even if only in the run game, and we score 21-28 points by halftime. There's a reason coaches, have always done that, especially with a new starter. Give him all the first team reps, let him find his groove. Then, you let the backups play. Not only does it give you a better sample size of your starter, it also helps to pour water on the idea that the backup is better if and when he lights it up, because it's a different setting. If Richardson is playing mostly scrubs in late Q3 and Q4, rather than starters in a tight game in the first half, then you're not seeing a true apples/apples comparison. You can argue that the backup was in mop up duty against a tired defense and/or 3rd stringers of an overmatched opponent. But we chose not to do that in both weeks. So we're all watching AR go out and dominate the same defensive players that EJ just threw INT's to or went 3-and-out against. This whole scenario is on Mullen and his mishandling of things.

This is one of those posts where reality is so obvious to see... after you read it. Very good observation.
 

TheDouglas78

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
16,334
14,789
Founding Member
My biggest issue with Mullen's demeanor when being asked these questions is that this controversy is entirely self inflicted. For starters, the fact that it took an injury to Franks to get a record setting QB on the field was completely his call. That was less than 2 years ago. Now, I've defended his logic because of his offense and the fact that FF had the body type to be a better fit. Coaches are generally drawn to potential and arm strength. But again, it was his call, and it was the wrong one. Own it and accept some natural hesitancy to think you have it all figured out.

But more than that, it's been his insistence on rotating them in games, as early as Q1 that's made it worse. I truly believe if Jones had been allowed to stay in against FAU throughout the entire first half and maybe into Q3, he would've developed a better rhythm, even if only in the run game, and we score 21-28 points by halftime. There's a reason coaches, have always done that, especially with a new starter. Give him all the first team reps, let him find his groove. Then, you let the backups play. Not only does it give you a better sample size of your starter, it also helps to pour water on the idea that the backup is better if and when he lights it up, because it's a different setting. If Richardson is playing mostly scrubs in late Q3 and Q4, rather than starters in a tight game in the first half, then you're not seeing a true apples/apples comparison. You can argue that the backup was in mop up duty against a tired defense and/or 3rd stringers of an overmatched opponent. But we chose not to do that in both weeks. So we're all watching AR go out and dominate the same defensive players that EJ just threw INT's to or went 3-and-out against. This whole scenario is on Mullen and his mishandling of things.

Exactly, same schit we talked about last week. Same schit we talked about last season. Destroys the whole rhythm of the offense changing the qb so early in the game. It's no longer about the quarterbacks, it's about the person who is always making the offense disjointed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.