- Jun 9, 2014
- 19,752
- 27,649
Founding Member
Lol, I was responding to your facepalm.You quoted yourself, but with what was basically my response.
Mind blown.
Lol, I was responding to your facepalm.You quoted yourself, but with what was basically my response.
Mind blown.
Yeah, and they really don't belong. Ohio State is a better team.
Yet another reason why the field needs to be expanded.Or them. If they blow out NW tonight, maybe they’re the pick. I just think that a 1 loss conference champ, who lost by 3, has to be in over a 2 loss runner up.
Urban about to get his poop pushed in by Vandy North....
I'm already drunk on beers.....Don’t hold your breath . There’s a better chance of you getting drunk on wine coolers tonight bro .
Yet another reason why the field needs to be expanded.
It's that or continue a system of seemingly arbitrary exclusion. I'd rather see teams play it out. It's single elimination.Totally disagree. If a two loss team that’s didn’t win its conference should be considered, then you’d have to say a 2 win conference WINNER is a definite. That means in a year like this, Ala could’ve shut it down in early November, right after Lsu, and then just get ready for the SECG. The dogs really could’ve as well. Tha would be terrible for cfb, and basically make it like the last few weeks of the NFL season.
Someone’s getting left out. Not ideal. But you had 12 weeks, plus a conference championship game to make your statement. If you didn’t, that’s on you. As I said last week, we’ve already seen 4-5 complete blowouts in the playoff in just 4 seasons. There just aren’t more than 4 championship caliber teams ach season. Four is enough.
...how’d like to bite my ass...in the middle!TO HELL WITH GEORGIA!
It's that or continue a system of seemingly arbitrary exclusion. I'd rather see teams play it out. It's single elimination.
The polls are, which is my point. I want to make it more inclusionary and let the chips fall where they may. Still boils down to one game, one opponent. Just makes the stakes higher and it lends itself to more of a buildup.Getting blown out by 29 points to a 6-6 team isn’t arbitrary. Neither is averaging giving up 50. Again, you have from September to November to prove it.
The polls are, which is my point. I want to make it more inclusionary and let the chips fall where they may. Still boils down to one game, one opponent. Just makes the stakes higher and it lends itself to more of a buildup.
College football's postseason as it stands is one big snoozefest.
Class A shares or Class B shares. What's your preference?Give me your keys.