I agree with this. I understand people disagreeing with his methods so far, and if it were 10 years ago, most people wouldn't be as worried. Our fan base has developed PTSD from the last 3 bozos, so it's difficult to automatically "trust the process" when that trust has been broken many times over the last decade.
But whether or not you agree with his methods, I think fans should at least respect his genuineness and honesty. He is doing what he said he would do, and he warned the fans that things won't look good for early signing day and to be patient because it will be worth it in the long run.
I too want immediate, positive results, but there are reasons why our last 3 coaches had some success their first two years and completely flamed out during year 3. You have to be more methodical to have lasting, long-term success. Taking guys simply for the sake of positive perception your first two weeks on the job really isn't fair for the players and doesn't help benefit the team and program down the road. What good are these guys if they end up transferring or riding the bench anyway? Napier apparently doesn't think they are a good fit for what he wants. Right or wrong, I completely get why he'd rather them leave now than transfer later.
Also, I've seen a few Charlie Strong comparisons, and that's pretty premature imo. Napier has only been employed by UF for 4 days. I'm sure there are lots of things he'll do differently than Strong over the next few months, and Strong didn't have the transfer portal to utilize either.
I said in Ox's thread that I would be more positive. It feels weird being a pumper.