Off to the theater for a double feature!
Joker (2019)
Never much of a DC fan, but wanted to see this both because I do like Jaoquin Phoenix and this is an interesting character (I do like origin stories). The film had only the lightest of connections to Batman or Bruce Wayne, and focused exclusively on the life and world of Arthur Fleck. Arthur has a day job as a clown for hire, and aspirations of being a standup comic. He lives with his mother, is enrolled in public services for counseling and medications, which of course get cut by the budget constraints of Gotham. We get to see inside the world of man barely hanging on, as if life is an ice rink and though he tries to steady himself it is always with footing that continues to keep him off balance. And as he slips further and further, and the world he believes fails him again and again, we see man not insane but giving up and embracing the reality he finds himself in. Wanting to be 'somebody', to be known, and loved....and finding rejection and ridicule everywhere.
Some may try to take political narration from this, a statement on today's society with big gov't failing people and mental illness going unaddressed. But I just went in for the ride, a two-hour escape into another world. I enjoyed that ride. There is word of a HUGE budget, and it shows without being overpowering...and it will make the money back several times over. It isn't a classic as either a film on it's own or in the sense of a cornerstone for the DC Universe, but it's a good film and worth seeing. No boobs, but a solid 8.5/10.
It Chapter 2 (2019)
The older film version was limited by the special effects of the day (and a ho-hum cast, IMO), and couldn't really bring to the screen the dread and terror one could conjure in their own mind from the book. The old film relied heavily on Tim Curry as Pennywise, which was very powerful but still held back by being a 1990 TV Miniseries. This one, made for the big screen, in 2017-2019 does it right proper, IMO. We still don't have an all-star cast, but it's much better. We have a big screen budget and 30y of special effects development. This was done right. Those who know the story get what they expect, while those that don't shouldn't have it spoiled by my comments. I will come back and answer this, however
I re-watched part the older version last week and it looked really goofy to me. This is way better. I did read the novel but so long ago my memory on it is fuzzy. I look forward to seeing your take.
Overall, I very much liked this film better for many reasons. But my biggest concern was how they'd handle the ending. The book, as I mentioned, went off in a direction that was really tough to follow or imagine, so it didn't make a lot of sense and left me feeling a bit empty. The miniseries tried to give it a visual sense, but flailed about and was still unsatisfying, IMO. This time, it finally clicked and made sense. The origin of Pennywise, the timelessness of his being and his previous battle(s?) now had something visual, believable, and gave me a context I could grasp and accept. So, as to the meaning of what was going on, I finally felt satisfied. As to the execution of that ending, well, there was a bit of hokiness abound starting with how they were able to knock Pennywise down to size...I mean, it fit and made sense, but still felt a bit cheap (in hindsight, it is actually perfectly fitting with the fear he fed upon, but c'mon, man). But I'll accept it.
Out of curiosity, did you catch the inside joke in the dialogue that was used too many times? The bit about Bill Denbrough (James McAvoy) being a writer and everyone criticizes his film for an ending nobody liked - a self deprecating shot by King on how nobody liked the original book-miniseries ending