- Jun 12, 2014
- 1,535
- 852
Founding Member
Nope, just stating you are putting forward the same illogical defense. If the coach isn't ultimately responsible for the play on the field or the court then why bother having one. The "well the coach isn't one playing the game" defense is one of the most laughable defenses of poor team performance one could come up with.
The only way that defense holds in any water is if we traded a musty for a Saban or a white for a coach k and not much changes. You and I both know if we had a top coach we'd be in much better shape than we are. That's why I find that line of defense laughable.
But you still my dawg big claw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree that coaches should be held accountable but I just don't see it here. Maybe if we were 10-17, and not 17-10 I could see and understand the criticism. But we have a 17-10 basketball team with a top 10 SOS under a first year coach with players he didn't recruit. Let's call them what they are, a wildly inconsistent basketball team. Also, to those saying why doesn't he draw up plays (I'm sure he does), explain how we could even be successful doing that if teams can run zone against us all game, protect the paint but give us open 3's and us only hit about 5 a game? Not whites fault in that category, imo.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk