Sure.
That being said it sounds like you’re a little butt hurt over the dislike. The reason you got it was not for THAT statement. It was for the ridiculous statement that hitting another player helmet to helmet and getting an unnecessary roughness call on it was a bullshyt call.
I don’t think you know what the rules are.
Thanks for proving my point.
Here's your rules, that I apparently don't know...
If a player uses any part of his helmet (including the top/crown and forehead/”hairline” parts) or facemask to butt, spear, or ram an opponent violently or unnecessarily. Although such violent or unnecessary use of the helmet and facemask is impermissible against any opponent, game officials will give special attention in administering this rule to protecting those players who are in virtually defenseless postures, including but not limited to:
(1) Forcibly hitting the defenseless player’s head, neck, or face with the helmet or facemask, regardless of whether the defensive player also uses his arms to tackle the defenseless player by encircling or grasping him; or
(2) Lowering the head and violently or unnecessarily making forcible contact with the “hairline” or forehead part of the helmet against any part of the defenseless player’s body;
He didn't lead with his helmet, it was incidental. He led with his shoulder and actually turned his head in an effort to not lead with it.
Here's a screenshot the split second before hitting Gronk and the video below. Doesn't matter though, it won't change your mind. Interesting how you backed off that PI call right after as well, which was ridiculous.