- Jun 12, 2014
- 5,424
- 9,473
Founding Member
Law98gator;n251750 said:21-16 and never even managed to win the division IS the evidence. The rest is just conjecture and excuses.
The bottom line is the bottom line.
He won 57% of his games at CSU, an improvement of 32% over the previous 3 years. Spurrier won 59% of his games at Duke, an improvement of 29% over the previous 3 years. Those records are not materially different.
In Spurrier's final season at Duke they went 8-4 overall, 6-1 in the conference finishing tied for first among the 8 teams (pre-FSU joining the conference) and unranked nationally. Also the team that he 'tied' with for first in the conference beat him head-to-head so if there really was some kind of trophy or playoff berth associated with it, Duke would not have been the 'champion'.
In Mac's final season at CSU he went 10-2 overall, 6-2 in the conference finishing tied for second among the 12 teams and unranked nationally. Again, not materially different.
Non of that is conjecture or an excuse. That's just comparing the actual results.