- Jul 29, 2014
- 22,269
- 23,586
Thats true, but its its a fvkking stupid argument.
The trend of people saying there's no need to expand to eight teams because there aren't even four legit title contenders in the first place. First @Swamp Donkey said it, then you, and probably someone else has said it by the time I'm done typing this.What trend? There are no examples in the last 30 years of having 4 legit teams and needing to hash it out via a playoff, and only 3-4 example of even needing a 3rd spot in the same time frame.
Maybe I misunderstood what you were saying.
Get off your one-track Mullinz obsession. This isn't about him or Florida, it's about the general question of how can we increase the amount of parity across the board and make college football seasons more interesting.
I already told you how to break it, and it has nothing to do with playoff expansion. How about the old fashioned way... beating someone. I know, I know...I refuse to believe there's no way to break that cycle.
Consider the example of college basketball.It doesnt make it more interesting, it makes it less. People would stop watching if the game didnt matter.
Hell, coaches would stop playing their starters like they do in the NFL the last few games.
It has nothing to do with your roster, it has to do with your season.The trend of people saying there's no need to expand to eight teams because there aren't even four legit title contenders in the first place. .
I would go to 8 teams but that still wouldn't stop the bytching from teams 9 thru 150.
All P5 Conference Champs should be in automatically.
The way to break the cycle is fire the shytty coaches you brought with you from cowbell (or most of them).I already told you how to break it, and it has nothing to do with playoff expansion. How about the old fashioned way... beating someone. I know, I know...
Totally disagree. If I wanted to watch a 4 loss team somehow making a magical run in a few games and winning it all, I'd watch any of the Giants' Super Bowls. The reality is, while on the surface that makes it seem more fair, again using the NFL as an example, how many better NFC teams will be sitting at home while the Cowboys host a playoff game? I disagree with expansion in general, but the automatic qualifier is the worst idea of them all.
Fixed your post for you.
Agreed, I'd say all P5 champs, plus the top-ranked non-P5, plus the two remaining highest-ranked teams regardless of conference.I would go to 8 teams but that still wouldn't stop the bytching from teams 9 thru 150.
All P5 Conference Champs should be in automatically.
Okay. :rolleyes: You really are a one-trick Donkey.The way to break the cycle is fire the shytty coaches you brought with you from cowbell (or most of them).
Dude, youre Mr Circular. Dildo Dan cant get in the playoffs bc he cant win against good teams in October, so why the fvkk do you think he is going to beat good teams in the playoff.
The reason he cant recruit is bc he sucks as a recruiter, not bc the playoff isnt 8 teams.
Nothing about an 8 team playoff means shytty coaches are going to be any less shytty in January than in October.
This is one doozy of an argument.
I don't mean this as a shot at you, but with that answer you strike me as someone who, truth be told, likes math better than sports. Or maybe you're just a degenerate gambler. ;) Because it sounds like you're saying you like predictable outcomes better than unpredictable ones.
For my part, I think a seemingly mediocre team making a magical run and somehow winning it all is a beautiful thing. To me that's the very essence of what's so great about sports. You don't know what's going to happen!