- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,550
- 111,091
Founding Member
Lets play with this poll question a bit.
I went with Zooker. Now I know the records look similiar between these three disasters, but in Zooker's day both the Inbreds and Azzsniffers were top 10 teams. Corndog also had top 10 talent and Saban. Clowntown and Scum were also a top teams, and ZookerZooker Scum once or twice, I forget. Simply put his record was much tougher to achieve and his record against ranked teams was better than Fooley'sFooley' Part 2 and 3.
Moreover, due purposefully avoiding scoring points neither Muskstank or Butters had any of hope of beating most decent teams. They only had a chance against other completely anemic offenses.
Zook was a terrible game day coach you say, yes he was. He is still the original Fooley's Folley, but he really had the chance of beating anyone, including Saban's first NC team. Mushchump and Sharkie couldnt beat Saban if they played him every week for 4 years.
It is clear to me.
I went with Zooker. Now I know the records look similiar between these three disasters, but in Zooker's day both the Inbreds and Azzsniffers were top 10 teams. Corndog also had top 10 talent and Saban. Clowntown and Scum were also a top teams, and ZookerZooker Scum once or twice, I forget. Simply put his record was much tougher to achieve and his record against ranked teams was better than Fooley'sFooley' Part 2 and 3.
Moreover, due purposefully avoiding scoring points neither Muskstank or Butters had any of hope of beating most decent teams. They only had a chance against other completely anemic offenses.
Zook was a terrible game day coach you say, yes he was. He is still the original Fooley's Folley, but he really had the chance of beating anyone, including Saban's first NC team. Mushchump and Sharkie couldnt beat Saban if they played him every week for 4 years.
It is clear to me.