- Aug 28, 2014
- 16,541
- 26,097
Okay well I've seen neither of those, because, ya know, I'm not a girl.No it was pitch perfect.
Okay well I've seen neither of those, because, ya know, I'm not a girl.No it was pitch perfect.
Wait till you have one and she says watch with me daddieOkay well I've seen neither of those, because, ya know, I'm not a girl.
Going by headline only.
@GatorBait247: #Gators help their chances for 5-star DE LaBryan Ray w/ strong visit (VIP) https://florida.247sports.com/Article/5-star-DE-LaBryan-Ray-enjoys-Florida-Gators-visit-50910274
Something that I would like to see looked at and discussed is how excessive are Bama classes, and what do you realistically need. What I mean by that is how much attrition occurs at Bama, and how any guys are wasted? One year (2013) they signed 4 RB's just so they could get the recruiting title. OL's and DT's ranked 3* consistently are productive in the SEC. So realistically how close do you need to be knowing that they have a fair amount of attrition and some positions don't require 4/5* type guys. So where do we really need to be? Is it essential to be top 5? I think we all agree that top 10 is a minimum, unless you follow Clemson's model of mediocre classes sprinkled with some elite guys. So do we need to be top 5? Or can we get away with alternating top 10 and top 5. I know we want to be top 3, but I'm afraid those days are going a ways off. So what's the MINIMUM we need to be?
2009, 2011, 2012 and 2015 BCS Nat ChampsIt depends on who is awarding. I don't consider that they have won 4 of the last 8 NC.
Something that I would like to see looked at and discussed is how excessive are Bama classes, and what do you realistically need. What I mean by that is how much attrition occurs at Bama, and how any guys are wasted? One year (2013) they signed 4 RB's just so they could get the recruiting title. OL's and DT's ranked 3* consistently are productive in the SEC. So realistically how close do you need to be knowing that they have a fair amount of attrition and some positions don't require 4/5* type guys. So where do we really need to be? Is it essential to be top 5? I think we all agree that top 10 is a minimum, unless you follow Clemson's model of mediocre classes sprinkled with some elite guys. So do we need to be top 5? Or can we get away with alternating top 10 and top 5. I know we want to be top 3, but I'm afraid those days are going a ways off. So what's the MINIMUM we need to be?
Having a qb friendly system is vital to having an elite qb. Neither mac or nuss has ever had one in their entire coaching career. Another problem i see with them is their qb evaluation on the recruiting trail. They're taking guys that don't have any business playing qb in the sec.
https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/want-a-national-title-sign-top-ten-classes-020316I've always been of the opinion that if you're top 10-12 on an annual basis, you fill your needs and you avoid situations like we had a few years in a row where we signed guys but lost like 60%+ of them in the first 18 months, you'll be just fine. Here's a hypothetical; what if we finished #10 nationally every year and the 9 teams in front of us were all SEC programs...do you really believe that in the Win/Lose column on the field we'll finish 10th in the conference every year, OR ANY YEAR FOR THAT MATTER? No, unless the coaching just flat out sucks. One of the reasons is that the difference between the 9th and 10th classes in my example may be one star on one player and the difference between #4 and #10 may be a star on a few players. Would we like to be #1, 2 or 3 in the country every year? Sure, but it's not mandatory...and if the product on the field is winning games and exciting to watch, we'll grab the occasional top 5 class. Now, we also can't be finishing at #23 in the nation and 10th in the conference, that won't cut it.
https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/want-a-national-title-sign-top-ten-classes-020316
Your post is total bullshyt. Total. I have 5-10 of these articles disproving your opinion. Stars matter. No matter how many times you pumpers post otherwise. it is FACT. It is PROVEN.
https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/want-a-national-title-sign-top-ten-classes-020316
Your post is total bullshyt. Total. I have 5-10 of these articles disproving your opinion. Stars matter. No matter how many times you pumpers post otherwise. it is FACT. It is PROVEN.
You posted this..You should get your facts straight, I've never been a pumper and have been just as critical of Mac & Co. as almost anybody on this board. Secondly, LEARN TO FCVKING READ AND COMPREHEND! I never said stars don't matter and I clearly stated that if you're consistently finishing top 10-12 while getting the occasional top 5 class (WHICH EFFECTIVELY WOULD BE A TOP 10 AVERAGE) then you'll be fine. The link you posted, which says finish in the top 10 consistently, lines up almost point for point with my post, you fcvking nimrod!
I've always been of the opinion that if you're top 10-12 on an annual basis, you fill your needs and you avoid situations like we had a few years in a row where we signed guys but lost like 60%+ of them in the first 18 months, you'll be just fine.
https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/want-a-national-title-sign-top-ten-classes-020316
Your post is total bullshyt. Total. I have 5-10 of these articles disproving your opinion. Stars matter. No matter how many times you pumpers post otherwise. it is FACT. It is PROVEN.
Yeah constantly ranking 10-12 ain't gonna cut it unless maybe you happen to pull an all world QB.
Did you not read the whole sentence?Unless your Clemson?