- Jun 11, 2014
- 16,754
- 20,381
Founding Member
And this was basically my point and much more. If we consistently recruit Top7, and keep up ST that you brought, I'm fine. And I do agree with you about trying to find a legit way to keep Seider. I do remember Hevesy and Gonzales being two of the first guys on board getting things going. The new WR group was pretty impressive with Copeland and the two transfers, but I don't really know how much of that was Gonzales. So while I get the whole Gonzales is dispensable, I wonder how much value he brought to the transition, since Knox stayed behind. I agree something likely could've been done different.
I guess when I hear continuity. I just think of how efficiently can we get this going, because the more that's installed in the Spring means the more that can be worked on confidently in the Summer. I'll defer to you an others as to the details of practices and meeting groups. And that's really my question...was Seider that much of an obstacle that he wasn't worth keeping. And it sounds like a resounding no, that he was 100% keeping, but find a place for Knox. Perhaps at TE, if Gonzales was valuable on the transition.
What I've found so interesting is that Mullins seems to have the guys playing above their talent level (recruiting ranking), when he was criticized as not able to do that. Granted, it's not like he's got top 30 talent as a top 10 team, but he's basically has Butter's 2 classes and 2 transition classes. So I'm really impressed, but I'll be more impressed if he keeps it up. At the end of the day that top 7 class needs to happen. If it doesn't, he needs to be proactive, which we know he won't be.
On a side note, I've been impressed with Grantham as well, and really impressed with Robinson for his part.
I guess when I hear continuity. I just think of how efficiently can we get this going, because the more that's installed in the Spring means the more that can be worked on confidently in the Summer. I'll defer to you an others as to the details of practices and meeting groups. And that's really my question...was Seider that much of an obstacle that he wasn't worth keeping. And it sounds like a resounding no, that he was 100% keeping, but find a place for Knox. Perhaps at TE, if Gonzales was valuable on the transition.
What I've found so interesting is that Mullins seems to have the guys playing above their talent level (recruiting ranking), when he was criticized as not able to do that. Granted, it's not like he's got top 30 talent as a top 10 team, but he's basically has Butter's 2 classes and 2 transition classes. So I'm really impressed, but I'll be more impressed if he keeps it up. At the end of the day that top 7 class needs to happen. If it doesn't, he needs to be proactive, which we know he won't be.
On a side note, I've been impressed with Grantham as well, and really impressed with Robinson for his part.