Just because Gwynn hit some balls over OF's heads doesn't mean they didn't play him shallow. I watched him play, his greatness was more about hitting it where they weren't, serving one down the line into LF, not hitting it over their heads. 7 HR's a year reinforces that point. And I never said RBI's were the only or even the main criteria. Was that a straw man or a red herring, I can't keep them straight. I've cited HR's, runs, RBI's, OPS+, WAR, walks, MVP finishes, playoff performances, championships and I'll add total bases, in which Jackson had 600 more. You implied Gwynn's singles were great scoring runners from second, I merely pointed out Jackson scored runners from every base to the tune of 564 more. If he batted 1-3 in the lineup like Gwynn did the majority of his career, do you think would've added to his 168 runs scored lead?
You look deeper? Your whole argument is based on a better average, 4 more doubles per season, and less K's. Jackson struck out a ton, but despite all the k's he still produced 600 more total bases and 732 more runs either driven in or scored. He was also better according to OPS+ and WAR, the two most cited advanced metrics. On top of all of that, he won a regular season MVP, had 4 more top 5's, and 2 WS MVP's. You know those, the MOST VALUABLE PlAYER helped two franchises to a total of 5 WS titles in 6 attempts.