- Jun 20, 2014
- 4,038
- 6,944
Founding Member
i disagree. Even practice means something considering there is not an infinite amount of them before the season starts.ufgator812;10411 said:Zip. Zero. Nada.
ufgator812;n10419 said:Your logic is flawed.
I never really thought about this lol. It will be like those Georgia southern fans sending you emails after that game lmaooxrageous;n10393 said:Law, you've really put all your cards on the table. If Muschamp ends up successful, you'll never live it down. Although many feel the odds are in your favor at this point.
I would LOVE for Muschimp to be successful. You remember chiding me for being on the bandwagon early on?oxrageous;n10393 said:Law, you've really put all your cards on the table. If Muschamp ends up successful, you'll never live it down. Although many feel the odds are in your favor at this point.
Or the Miami Dolphins the only perfect team at least by record.deuce said:I remember when the GreenBay Packers would come up to the line of Scrimmage, tell you what play they were running and you still couldn't stop them. They didn't have the most talented players but every man knew his job and executed his assignment.
I somewhat agree and if he does not keep the pressure on from the offense but rather goes to the very conservative offense we have seen in the past (unless he shreds our opponents by running) he will most likely be replaced. Process and practice produces wins, have good execution and good process and the wins will result. When we won so many games we were lucky, luck always runs out, skill generally does not.Law98gator said:I would LOVE for Muschimp to be successful. You remember chiding me for being on the bandwagon early on?oxrageous;n10393 said:Law, you've really put all your cards on the table. If Muschamp ends up successful, you'll never live it down. Although many feel the odds are in your favor at this point.
Remember commenting on how silly it was to call a guy Champ when he'd never won anything? That wasn't that long ago, pal.
I believed what he said about having a balanced aggressive pro-style offense and thought he meant to run what Weis and/or Peace had run previously. He said he was going to be multiple and unpredictable. We got anything but that. Obviously, I was a silly for believing him.
For me the balloon burst in 12, when he was rebuking the fanbase and praising our offense. It was obviously just what he wanted. Close games, flip a coin at the end. Hope for nothing but heads. He got that in 12. He got nothing but tails in 13. It's his kind of football.
He just doesn't have the tools. Anyone really think when the game is on the line, he's going to do anything but be ultraconservative? Think he'll say keep the offense opened up once we are blowing them out by 6 or 7 points? Hell, no. Dooley/Goofball is in his soul.
I doubt they will lay all their cards on the table, before Bamer; however, we should be able to score, at will, against the first 3 teams, running stuff that Bamer knows we will run. That's what I will be looking for. A well coached team, that has superior talent, will score, even if the opponent knows the play.Gator Fever said:I agree we will probably know if he has truly went total hands off with the offense in the Idaho game. If we don't score in the 40's or we are running basic run plays once we get a 2 TD lead then he is still pushing his philosophy most likely.