- Jun 13, 2014
- 845
- 2,080
Founding Member
Good luck. we play like a Mac team trying to confuse the other team and as if we're always facing superior talent thus need the gimmicky stuff too offset the talent gap.No more gimmick football please
On offense, I would say only Brewster and possibly Billy G. Dan needs to fire the entire staff except those two and, I would not be opposed to Billy G. getting fired. Brewster is the only recruiter on the whole staff and he seems like a solid TE coach...I keep hearing this. Other than the DL coach, I probably agree.
That being said, who on the offensive staff is even arguably vaguely competent?
yeah... I probably agree but he is a fuchsing Clown. I will swallow it for now, bc I have to. It is a sad state of affairs though.Brewster is the only recruiter on the whole staff and he seems like a solid TE coach...
Nothing. You just arent a dumb fat dwag.Let's go a step further. While I freely admit I'm no coach and don't always understand the schematic nature of things, can someone please tell me how one guy blitzing instead of another who happens to be the same depth and what appears to be only about 3 yards to the left, somehow makes this exotic or confusing for an opposing QB. I get stunts and having DE's drop into coverage while a DB/S pressures. Those things seem unexpected. But how would the guy on the right blitzing be any less(or more) effective than the the one on the left? The only difference I see is that it puts that LB at a significant disadvantage in coverage. What am I missing?
The exotic part is making the LB furthest away from area needing coverage sprint over there to do the covering. Thats exotic.
So the unexpected element is that we're using one guy who has no chance to make to the QB in time to blitz, while using another who has no chance of getting to the WR in time to cover, and they feel no one in their right mind would do that?
Basically they're thinking there's no way we'd be staying, not hitting, if we didn't have a really good hand. Then we confidently lay down the 2 and 5 we have.
what you fail to acknowledge in this post, is that while we are in fact doing the opposite of what makes sense, we are doing it with 3*s which is what truly makes Todd... wait for it... Exotic.Let's go a step further. While I freely admit I'm no coach and don't always understand the schematic nature of things, can someone please tell me how one guy blitzing instead of another who happens to be the same depth and what appears to be only about 3 yards to the left, somehow makes this exotic or confusing for an opposing QB. I get stunts and having DE's drop into coverage while a DB/S pressures. Those things seem unexpected. But how would the guy on the right blitzing be any less(or more) effective than the the one on the left? The only difference I see is that it puts that LB at a significant disadvantage in coverage. What am I missing?
Let's go a step further. While I freely admit I'm no coach and don't always understand the schematic nature of things, can someone please tell me how one guy blitzing instead of another who happens to be the same depth and what appears to be only about 3 yards to the left, somehow makes this exotic or confusing for an opposing QB. I get stunts and having DE's drop into coverage while a DB/S pressures. Those things seem unexpected. But how would the guy on the right blitzing be any less(or more) effective than the the one on the left? The only difference I see is that it puts that LB at a significant disadvantage in coverage. What am I missing?