Gatorwitt;n176914 said:Alvin, couldn't you have just asked "Who's Better"? Instead of writing 3 paragraphs asking the exact same thing?
Alvin York;n176918 said:Yes, I could have but my Mother Teresa spirit of humanity guided me to use statistics to better inform our unfortunate less educated jort clad folks of the sunshine state.
Alvin York;n176721 said:Perhaps. Perhaps not.
What astonishes me is Montana's average QB rating of 127.8 along with 11 touchdowns with no interceptions. I don't think those records will ever be broken.
GatorJB;n176967 said:We already know that Brady has more post season wins, but another thing I forgot to mention that Brady also has significantly more regular season wins (43 more) than Montana. And that's with Brady playing 15 seasons and Montana 16. Interesting that they both have the same number of losses (47), but the win to loss ratio isn't even close. Looks like Montana was more injury prone than Brady since he had played fewer games, so that probably hurt Montana's total win record. Still it is unlikely that he'd have more wins than Brady.
Anyways, when you compare both regular and post season stats and records, Brady clearly has the upper hand.
AlexDaGator;n176763 said:Another issue is that Montana benefited from a system that was way ahead of everybody else.
Settle down, I'm now saying Montana was a system QB. He would have thrived on any other team in the NFL during his era (or any other era).
BUT...he did have the advantage of being in this system that revolutionized passing offenses in the NFL. It really wasn't until the advent of the zone blitz scheme and the Tampa Cover 2 defense that defenses caught up with the West Coast offense.
When Bill Walsh first rolled that thing out it was unstoppable.
Additionally, Montana had Jerry Rice and Roger Craig. Both perfect for that offense. Even on defense he had Ronnie Lott.
Brady won Super Bowls with a lot of average talent around him but he played in an NFL with a lot of average teams in it. Montana was on a great team that had to play against a few other great teams.
The only way to answer this question is to reverse their roles, imagine Tom Brady as the Niners QB in the 80's and 90's and Joe Montana as the Pats QB in the 00's and 10's.
I think Brady does the same or a bit better as a Bill Walsh Niner. I think Montana does a shade worse as a Belichik Patriot.
Alex.
Alvin York;n176918 said:Yes, I could have but my Mother Teresa spirit of humanity guided me to use statistics to better inform our unfortunate less educated jort clad folks of the sunshine state.
CapitalGator02;n177071 said:Forgot about Luck. He is leaps and bounds better than Manning. Add him to my list too
Alvin York;n177089 said:Florida folks!
Man, you just will not give Peyton a break, will you? Sometimes I think your hate is so all consuming you would rather join Isis than admit Peyton Manning was one of the great quarterbacks of this era.
Hotrod;n177239 said:Alvin York was a true American hero who the whole country and the state of Tenn. should be justly proud of and honor. You using his name is an injustice to his honor and memory. Stop boring us with your stupid rhetoric. I can't even remember the last time the Vols beat the Gators. Go away and don't come back until you have something intelligent to say. If I use the word intelligent that means you will never be back.
WobbleGator;n176648 said:Incorrect. There never was a debate.
GatorJ;n178468 said:Much harder to win Super Bowls now. But there are more QB and offense friendly rules.
Both are the best of their generations. Just like Unitas was the best of his. Brady isn't tainted but his legacy is tainted with Spygate. He would have to win 2 more because of that to be #1. Which sounds absurd but it really shows how great he, Montana, and Unitas are. That we're talking 6 Super Bowl victories (8 appearances at least) to be crowned as the best ever demonstrates how high the bar is.