Yep i don't get that one...i would be perfectly fine with the Mullen hire if there was a logical reason why Norvell wasn't considered. In coaching searches you have to understand what is available and what is actually obtainable. Kelly and Frost were available and appear to be the HR hires of this year but neither were really attainable. Frost will go home and Kelly took a bunch less money to go where he was comfortable in UCLA...i don't believe he was doing any more with us than using us for leverage and still took way less money. So who does that leave? Mullen, Strong, maybe Taggert (1st year on the job it's likely he doesn't leave). Then there is the next young innovative coach in Norvell that is sitting right there for the taking. Maybe there is a reason he was left off...but he would have been in the same time frame as Frost since they are playing each other this week. I'm guessing Frost told them no and word of Mullen to tenn made Stricklin freak out knowing he wasn't going to last to the next weekend and had to act. Personally i would have waiting on Norvell then with a fall back of Strong or Taggert but i am not privy to what Stricklin is on these background checks and everything else that goes into the coaching search...so i'll get behind Mullen even though it's not what i had hoped for.
Exactly my sentiments. I didn't see this coming, and certainly not my first choice. But I'll get behind whoever it is, and hope for the best. Not sure we have any other choice. If it goes well, great. If not, Stricklin has sealed his fate.
As for Brindise, I think we have to keep in mind that landscapes change in cfb, and generations don't always want to accept that. Regardless of who we brought in, including Kelly or Frost, there would've been criticism from that group of Matthews, Doering and Brindise because it's not the type of offense they prefer. Keep in mind, this is also the same group that had issues with our offense while Tebow was winning Heismans and rings, and were thrilled to see a change under WM, declaring that staff (including Weis) the best overall staff we'd ever had. This was 3 years removed from a staff that consisted of Strong, Mullen, Dan McCarney, Vance Bedford, and Urban Meyer.
I'm not questioning their loyalty to UF, that speaks for itself. Nor am I questioning their place in UF history and football acumen. What I do question, however, is their objectiveness in these cases. They just have a different view and nothing is going to change that.