t-gator;n34113 said:
The rams had the whole off season to move in a different direction. They're idiots for paying a possibly the most injury prone an ever. I don't feel sorry for them idiots.
Well they could have released him, meaning they still have to pay him. Or they could have traded him, which they weren't going to do because he's been a solid QB in the time that he's been on the field. He was offensive ROTY, slumped a bit and struggled with injuries his 2nd year, then had a solid 3rd year and was having arguably his best season last year until he got hurt. So your reasoning is that since he missed 9 games with an injury last year, they should have gotten rid of their franchise quarterback?
Can you take over the Cowboys as GM so they can remain horrible forever? Thanks.