GI, I thought you were smarter than this. There's a difference between telling someone they don't know what they are talking about and calling them a liar. I never called you a liar. YOU, on the other hand, flat out called my sources liars. So how are you so much better in this situation?
Unbunch your panties, it's a message
Ox, uou been hanging out with Obama's Press Secretary. I stated what I have been told by some people who know what's going on and you stated that I didn't know "WTF" I was talking about. How could that be interpreted as anything other than you accusing my of lying? Now, had I said that it was my opinion, then it would have meant that my opinion was wrong and that's fine. I did call whoever told you that Muschamp was told he wasn't being retained a liar, because they lied when they told you that and I'll tell them that to their face.
No, I wasn't angry. I chose the use those words to make a point, because you broke out the "WTF" bomb. Trust me, I may challenge some comments, but, I don't get angry over such things. Mess with my kids and you will see angry. There are fans with various opinions. It seems that the only opinion that is welcomed here is the anti-Muschamp posters. That's the main reason there has been a drop off in the debate. If a poster makes a point in Muschamp's favor, he/she is made to look like they are mad, stupid or lying. Not many want to participate in that kind of discussion. There's not much tolerance for opposing views. BTW, Danny Weurfel just endorsed Muschamp and said he should be retained. His argument was rather convincing.