I think expanding beyond the games we already have is a mistake. What needs to happen is the CGs simply need to be part of the playoff. It is beyond stupid to play the CGs and THEN vote on the playoff.
The easiest fix is for the committee to take the current formula and rank the teams that are playing in the CGs BEFORE the CGs are played. After the CGs are played, the 4 highest ranked winners move on. The important thing to keep in mind with this concept is that the committee rankings are NOT simply a mirror of the AP/coaches polls. In effect you have the committee determining who the "best" 8 or 10 teams are, then using the CGs as the first round of a playoff.
This keeps HUGE emphasis on the regular season and even more emphasis on the CGs. Another pivotal part of this system is already coming to fruition, which is getting rid of divisions so that the best two teams in the conference play the CG, which would have put OSU instead of Iowa.
Nah.... then you just make the FIRST Michigan/OSU game mean nothing. Or the first UF/UT game in the 90s mean nothing.
Just let every every Conference Champion with 0 or 1 loss in the playoff, and adjust bye weeks accordongly, using old BCS formula which really got it right. 3 teams qualify? 1 has a bye, 2 plays 3. 5 teams qualify? 1 bye, 2 plays 5 and 3 plays 4.
There arent 8 teams.who have earned a shot at an NC and there sure as fuchs arent 12 or 16.
The BCS would put Michigan vs Washington in NC and that is the right result. None of the second tier teams except FSU even have an argument for being #1 or #2. They are arguing about being number fuchsing 4.
We argue now about #4 and in a few years we will be arguing about which **** 3 loss team didnt deserve to fet left out of #12 or #16.
Fuchs the playoff and fuchs destroying the bowls.