Treon Harris - Pepsi drinker?

[Zambo]

What does "Tweet" mean?

I don't know, but I do know that a twack is what a twain wuns on.

 

[WillGetIn]

Since the open kicker tryout was so successful, UF will be holding an open QB tryout this week...

This.

 

[dubster1]

jack daniels > johnny walker

 

[Double Gator Dad]

Pepsi is not greater than Coke. Pepsi is willing to spend more money than Coke. I have first hand knowledge. Yes, UF switched to Pepsi in the early 2000's when Pepsi bought Gatorade. Until that point Coke had the business with Gatorade being the lone exception. When Pepsi bought Gatorade, they unloaded a truckload of money on the UF athletic department because and I quote "We cannot have the birthplace of Gatorade selling Coke." They are not greater in any way you look at it. Coke has superior share and financial viability Coke is a southern company with a southern culture Coke was UF's partner for over 50 years. Buying the business does not make you greater. With that said, I love the way PepsiCo has played up the brand history of Gatorade.

 

[Concrete Helmet]

Pepsi is not greater than Coke. Pepsi is willing to spend more money than Coke. I have first hand knowledge. Yes, UF switched to Pepsi in the early 2000's when Pepsi bought Gatorade. Until that point Coke had the business with Gatorade being the lone exception. When Pepsi bought Gatorade, they unloaded a truckload of money on the UF athletic department because and I quote "We cannot have the birthplace of Gatorade selling Coke." They are not greater in any way you look at it. Coke has superior share and financial viability Coke is a southern company with a southern culture Coke was UF's partner for over 50 years. Buying the business does not make you greater. With that said, I love the way PepsiCo has played up the brand history of Gatorade.

Soooo.....do you drink Coke or Pepsi?

 

[NavetG8r]

Maybe something to do with this? Does ESPN know something we don't know?

 

[oxrageous]

Boy, would that news change the dynamic of the Alabama game.

 

[Go Gata]

I think that's because, even after sitting out the last few games, Grier still has better passing stats than anyone else on either team.

 

[NavetG8r]

Pretty sure it's this:
[h=1]Florida’s Jonathan Bullard doubtful for South Carolina game[/h]

https://www.seccountry.com/florida/f...-carolina-game

 

[gatormandan]

Ok, I will tell you...I sent in film of me throwing 3-5 yard passes and was named the starting QB for the remainder of the season.

 

[Captain Sasquatch]

Maybe something to do with this? Does ESPN know something we don't know?

They've continued to list Grier as our leading passer since the suspension. I highly doubt anyone who does the previews for the games even pays attention to it.

 

[LongTooth]

Ivie is out. Bullard is doubtful with an arm injury. Neal is also questionable with a foot injury.

Well, crap. Heal up for FSU and bammer fellas.

https://www.seccountry.com/florida/floridas-jonathan-bullard-doubtful-for-south-carolina-game

 

[gardnerwebbgator]

We've been using a good rotation on the DL all season. This is where it will pay off. Also, since it will be quite cool Saturday (50's), the heat won't be a factor.

 

[lagator]

Sherit must be suspended for the first half also since his targeting (BS) was held up on review, correct? Despite the depth, missing Bullard, Ivie and Sherit is a problem

 

[LongTooth]

Sherit must be suspended for the first half also since his targeting (BS) was held up on review, correct? Despite the depth, missing Bullard, Ivie and Sherit is a problem

Since Sherit's "offense" occurred in the second half of the Vandy game, he is out for the entire game against the cocks.

We are down three defensive lineman from our 1's and 2's in the worst case scenario.

 

[soflagator]

Sherit must be suspended for the first half also since his targeting (BS) was held up on review, correct? Despite the depth, missing Bullard, Ivie and Sherit is a problem

We really need that "targeting" call to be called against a top team's best player and cost them a conference title or playoff birth as a result. It's out of control and needs to be unwound immediately. It's absolutely asinine to think a player can deliberately commit a dead ball personal foul and get 15 yards, while an unintentional less than perfect angle in the heat of a play can cost a kid 1/12th of his season. Maybe the most egregious misuse of power they've ever employed.

 

[lagator]

Since Sherit's "offense" occurred in the second half of the Vandy game, he is out for the entire game against the cocks.

We are down three defensive lineman from our 1's and 2's in the worst case scenario.

Damn, that's right, the whole game. Bullard might just need to rub some dirt on it. He's better than most even with one arm.

 

[ChiefGator]

This is very bad news, but next man up is the way to go. Offense better produce or we will be in serious trouble in this game.

 

[divits]

We really need that "targeting" call to be called against a top team's best player and cost them a conference title or playoff birth as a result. It's out of control and needs to be unwound immediately. It's absolutely asinine to think a player can deliberately commit a dead ball personal foul and get 15 yards, while an unintentional less than perfect angle in the heat of a play can cost a kid 1/12th of his season. Maybe the most egregious misuse of power they've ever employed.

Without a doubt one of the most ridiculous rules in college football besides the one that costs a player a full freakin' year for taking legal supplements. It's hard to imagine clear thinking adults coming up with these asinine rules. I'd like to crash their rules committee meeting and beat each and every one of them smartly about the head, neck, chest and face.

 

[URGatorBait]

Since Sherit's "offense" occurred in the second half of the Vandy game, he is out for the entire game against the cocks.

We are down three defensive lineman from our 1's and 2's in the worst case scenario.

That's not how the rule reads.
If it happens in the first half, it's for the remainder of the game, if it happens in the second half, then its for the remainder of that game plus first half of next game, even if it has to carry over into the next year of eligibility, if any remains.

Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet ARTICLE 3� No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet� When in question, it is a foul� (Rule 9-6) (A�R� 9-1-3-I) Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player ARTICLE 4� No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder� When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6)� (A�R� 9-14-I-VI) PENALTY [ARTICLE 3 and ARTICLE 4]—15 yards. For dead-ball fouls, 15 yards from the succeeding spot. Automatic first down for fouls by Team B if not in conflict with other rules. For fouls in the first half: Disqualification for the remainder of the game. (Rule 2-27-12) For fouls in the second half: Disqualification for the remainder of the game and the first half of the next game. If the foul occurs in the second half of the last game of the season, players with remaining eligibility shall serve the suspension during the first game of the following season. The disqualification is subject to review by Instant Replay (Rule 12-3-5-f). [S38, S24 and S47] When the Instant Replay Official reverses the disqualification: If the targeting foul is not in conjunction with another personal foul by the same player, the 15-yard penalty for targeting is not enforced. If the player commits another personal foul in conjunction with the targeting foul, the 15-yard penalty for that personal foul is enforced according to rule. (A. R. 9-1-4-VII-VIII)