Will Grier loses appeal
- Thread starter G8RNGA
- Start date
- Jun 14, 2014
- 25,397
- 29,513
Founding Member
MJMGator;n307628 said:
Perhaps that's one point of legal-rights contention. To so strongly punish someone, the test protocol has to be assured,
the ingredient isolated, the titer assayed i.e. drug dosage to be related to the magnitude of effect . The NCAA is
messing with young men's careers here.
- Jun 11, 2014
- 16,754
- 20,381
Founding Member
T REX;n307498 said:
Well aren't you just the poster child for abortion
- Jun 12, 2014
- 16,336
- 14,798
Founding Member
biggator6;n307504 said:
A full calendar year where your scholarship and expenses are still paid. OR a 1/4 of the year where you are cut off from pay? The NFL and NCAA are two very different organizations, this comparison doesn't make sense without the full context of the argument.
- Jun 12, 2014
- 7,141
- 6,229
Founding Member
Grier has ZERO grounds for a successful appeal.
- Jul 29, 2014
- 22,236
- 23,528
dubster1;n307802 said:this thread is starting to deliver
I think winning has raised the testosterone level of the board lately, maybe Ox needs to come up with a list of banned substances for users of this board...
- Oct 15, 2014
- 12,195
- 16,992
LagoonGator68;n307798 said:
Yea...thats why the university and several lawyers have backed him and put together an appeal. Im sure they are just as positive they wont win...
- Jun 10, 2014
- 20,183
- 41,487
Founding Member
All we know is what has been reported. From what I've read and his dad has said, he bought an OTC supplement at GNC that he took for several weeks and then stopped because it wasn't doing anything. This is what supposedly caused the failed test. He openly admitted he didn't get it cleared through the medical staff and should have. If all that is true, what exactly does are the grounds for his appeal? Stupidity? Negligence?Zambo;n307800 said:
I hope he can get it reduced, but I can't see why the NCAA would even consider it if the above is true. The only way possible if the packaging did NOT contain the banned substance in the ingredients, but then he'd have to try and prove that's the only substance he took...which seems impossible to do. I'd put his chances at a successful appeal at slim to none.
- Jun 12, 2014
- 16,336
- 14,798
Founding Member
Zambo;n307800 said:
Grier admitted to taking and OTC substance without getting it cleared through the UF medical staff. He might get it reduced, but by his own admission he put himself in this position.
- Jun 19, 2014
- 21,586
- 48,401
Founding Member
C'mon yall, there's a reason the university and his folks wont come out and say it, and why he was so embarrased, and why he didnt check with the staff about it. He was taking freaking d*ck pills to keep up with all that poontang he was slaying! You think he wants to go to one of the trainers and say, "hey doc, is it cool if i take this extenze? I got 3 chics to service tonight and need a little boost!"
Im mostly joking, but if I was forced at gunpoint to state what he took, I'd go with the d*ck pills. It just makes too much sense.
Im mostly joking, but if I was forced at gunpoint to state what he took, I'd go with the d*ck pills. It just makes too much sense.
- Oct 15, 2014
- 12,195
- 16,992
TheDouglas78;n307822 said:
NOBODY thinks he didnt put himself in this position. I dont think thats even a question.
- Jun 12, 2014
- 16,336
- 14,798
Founding Member
gatormandan;n307826 said:
which in the end why he is suspended. If he had done due diligence (which is on him) he would have more of a grounds for an appeal. Right now the story is that he took something he shouldn't have (mistake or not) and it was a banded substance. The ruling isn't going to be reversed unless their is a technicality that they can exploit.
- Jun 11, 2014
- 34,971
- 33,106
Founding Member
Has he won the appeal yet?
