What's more important in your opinion, our record or how we actually perform on the field? The reason I ask, is because with the mac years, folks said the trips to the SECCG, and the record weren't really a good indicator of how the team was doing. That it was more so a weak east and muschamps defense.
I'm not sure how it's hard to judge savage? We had less injuries than I can ever remember, we never gave up or appeared to run out of gas like before, and everyone raves about him, opposite of kent.
As for Seider vs knox, I think seider is a better recruiter, but how is he as a coach? Was it important for Mullen to be able to trust his coaches year one while putting his stamp on UF?