Maybe over the long term, statisticaly, the higher number of five stars you have the better. But on an individual player basis it is totally hit and miss (for example our last 5*s, Jefferson & Ivey). A player has the same talent whether he's a 3* or a 4*.
Uhhh stars= talent.
You are supposed to say we dont need no stinkin talent because 3 star whisperer... or something like that.
sorry. maybe i'm the one who is drunk.
247 is way off. Kid is eliteUmmm... Someone is way off.
So when a site has a player rated as a 3* and then the moment Alabama or Georgia offer him he becomes a 4* is his talent better than before?
Awful early to be drunk. A kid is 3* because he doesn't have the talent to be a 4*, speed strenght, route running accuracy, whatever. Ditto why a 4* isn't a 5*.
That makes absolutely zero sense. Inability to land talent is one of the many reasons Butters is gone, despite many of you claiming he was a 3* Whisperer who didn't need talent.
Werent you one of those saying the reason Mullinz didn't win at Cowbell is because he could only land 3 stars there?
Stampini CB'd Gerald Mincey to us. A 3 OL class of Braun, Mincey and Van Pran would be a great class!
OK class, I really like Mincey and Braun.
Have you seen van Pran's film?
I want 5 OL, a TE, 2 WRs, a QB, a TB, 2 DTs, 1 SDE, 1 WDE, 2 ILBs, 1 OLB, and 4 DBs every year. That is 22. beyond that add whatever your roster needs are an extra this or that to get to 25-27. It isnt that hard.
