- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,529
- 111,044
Founding Member
Sorry. I dont know how to drive this thing.
2 UF Administrators lose jobs over "Poor Judgement"
- Thread starter Marianna-FL_Gator
- Start date
- Jun 12, 2014
- 7,137
- 6,226
Founding Member
You have conversations blocked in your settings or privacy somewhere....I tried and couldn't start one with you either......
- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,529
- 111,044
Founding Member
I clicked on preferences and now I'm afraid I'm growing hair everywhere.
- Jun 12, 2014
- 7,137
- 6,226
Founding Member
- Jun 12, 2014
- 8,465
- 14,805
Founding Member
@Deadspin: UF: We fired Title IX official for buying eBay porn like 'Cyborg Sex?' and '4 Hour Weird Positions' from work email http://deadsp.in/fibxPrH
- Mar 27, 2016
- 4,890
- 3,201
Yeah the reason the guy was fired was easy. Why someone else was fired because they gave him a good reference is harder to figure.
In modern business most people find it easier to give any ex-employee a positive letter of reference rather than risk litigation from the ex-employee. Often time people give a positive letter of reference and a more negative oral reference if they thought the employee was not very good. There is a less clear record of an oral reference.
I can only guess in this circumstance someone was gunning for the other person and used this situation as an excuse to get them?
In modern business most people find it easier to give any ex-employee a positive letter of reference rather than risk litigation from the ex-employee. Often time people give a positive letter of reference and a more negative oral reference if they thought the employee was not very good. There is a less clear record of an oral reference.
I can only guess in this circumstance someone was gunning for the other person and used this situation as an excuse to get them?
- Nov 9, 2015
- 7,401
- 4,168
In modern business they say the start date, end date and if they would be welcome back to their position (sometimes). In this case they would not be welcome back so only confirmation of their time at UF was appropriate. They need a policy if they don't have one, perhaps they do and this was a violation. Your idea of risk is correct, so you say almost nothing officially as a representative of the company.
