Another interesting fact about stars, and this argument is a bit on the pumperish side, along the line of the dreaded "trust the coaches".
Will Miles tried to look at whether Mullen develops players better than his peers. On average, a 3 star player has a chance of about 5.9% of making it to the NFL. On the other hand, it seems Mullen's 3 star recruits get drafted to the NFL at a rate of about 8.3%, which is significantly more than the average for other coaches.
Even for his 4 star players. The average ranking of his 4 star recruit is 197. On average those would get drafted at a rate of about 15.3% in college football, but yet under Mullen they got drafted at a rate of 18.9%.
His takeaway was that there maybe an argument that Mullen is an above average player developer. I think what Will Miles may have missed, is that Mullen could also be a better judge of talent than his peers on average. Since we know that overall the quality of players lower than roughly 60-90 practically plateaus, then maybe Mullen and co are just better at picking them too?
Out of his 12 2* recruits that he recruited in the past, 2 of them made the NFL which is crazy.
Again, I am not saying that the 3 star butters special is going to be as good as a 4 star / 5 star. But perhaps a 4 star ranked 200 that he recruits will probably do better than a similarly ranked player recruited by someone else.
TIFWIW.
How much better is Dan Mullen at developing players than his peers? - Read and Reaction