I’m basing my opinion primarily on the QB play throughout the season with emphasis on the struggles at that position early on (no firm starter, loss to Tx, etc.). I think deciding to go with Milroe was the best choice, though he IMO is not a natural at the position but a gifted athlete. I think his performance against Auburn, which was not necessarily all-star level, painted a good picture. He was able to extend the final play and with the help of Freeze’s decision to essentially go no-pressure, he threw a strike to a guy who got open and kept alive their playoff chances. He was a player that made a play.
Milroe’s limitations, to me, start with his penchant to quickly react to pressure and use his speed and athleticism as a safety valve. The more polished QB knows that extending passing plays in order to allow covered receivers time to break off routes and settle into openings is a way to gain yardage and frustrate the opponent, but it also gives the QB a chance to minimize the number of shots absorbed during the game, which can certainly have a cumulative effect.
So, the majority of my thoughts regarding Bama and some overachieving are based on the QB position. I do think Milroe grew from the beginning of the season through the last game, but he certainly hasn’t topped out. How high can he go? Depends on him and maybe who is recruited at the position behind him. Who knows that with better competition at QB this year, he might have developed a little further? Beyond that, I’d have to say there’s work to be done with the OL, despite a beautiful performance against a salty UGA defensive front in the SECCG. Make no mistake, Bama’s OL was great that day, but they got punched in the mouth by Michigan and didn’t respond with the same resolve as they did against the Dawgs. The best find a way to compete at a consistently high level. Maybe they were able to overachieve in that circumstance? Bama wasn’t able to pull that part off against UM for a place in the title game so there’s work to be done there.