- Jun 12, 2014
- 7,146
- 6,233
Founding Member
Selecting just one proponent of thugism out of 12 shouldn't be too hard in voir dire, in that area of the country.
Kyle Aspinwall, from Glock Inc., testified as an expert witness for the prosecution.Gator Fever;n205852 said:I think his lawyer got one of the state's witnesses to say that could have been an I phone or something like that when shown at another angle on one of the videos at least.
crosscreekcooter;n205875 said:Kyle Aspinwall, from Glock Inc., testified as an expert witness for the prosecution.
Glock expert Kyle Aspinwall While on the stand Aspinwall pointed out unique features of a .45 Glock, which is the model weapon prosecutors say was used to kill Lloyd. The murder weapon has never been recovered.
Prosecutors then showed Aspinwall still pictures of surveillance video taken inside Hernandez’s home.
Aspinwall said it was his opinion Hernandez was holding a gun in those photos and – pointing out defining features – that the gun was a Glock pistol.
Yeah, I suppose the Glock and a 5c share similar features.
Yep...for all we know they were just going out there to smoke that JWobbleGator;n205760 said:The actual gun? A witness to the shooting? Nothing shows that AH pulled the trigger or planned for the killing to happen.
WobbleGator;n205760 said:The actual gun? A witness to the shooting? Nothing shows that AH pulled the trigger or planned for the killing to happen.
WobbleGator;n205760 said:The actual gun? A witness to the shooting? Nothing shows that AH pulled the trigger or planned for the killing to happen.
PatDooleySucks;n205886 said:The gun would be helpful but the prosecution has put in very favorable evidence that explains why it's not present and has compensated for it with other direct evidence (video of him with the same model, same shell casings found in his apartment).
Witnesses to crimes are certainly helpful but in cases like these they are often dead.
The prosecution doesn't need to prove AH pulled the trigger. The circumstances of the killing are enough to show it was planned, and the defense isn't contesting that it was planned. They are only contesting that Hernandez was an innocent bystander.
WobbleGator;n205924 said:No, the evidence doesn't show that a murder was planned, only that a meeting was planned.
PatDooleySucks;n205950 said:Are you suggesting that to convict somebody of murder the prosecutor would have to show some elaborate scheme be proven? Like "I didn't plan to kill him. We got there, and at the last minute I just took out a gun and shot him, so I'm innocent." All the DA has to show is that he had intent to kill him. All the circumstantial evidence revolving around this case is just cake.
WobbleGator;n205962 said:What evidence did they show that showed AH had intent to kill the victim?
Nice of you to take Winston's d!ck out of your mouth for long enough to join us again.Sgt. Schultz;n205885 said:That sounds reasonable, and with the evidence that the prosecution was allowed to present, I see Hernandez either being acquitted or found guilty of a far lesser charge than 1st Degree Murder. I just can't see the "beyond a reasonable doubt" burden being met by the prosecution. But you never know what a jury is thinking.