heavychevy
water bottle holder
- Sep 8, 2014
- 984
- 1,086
the point is you were wrong about the suspectWhat's the point? I simply threw out a statement that could have given validity to the gun having rights.
probably had a CWP.
the point is you were wrong about the suspectWhat's the point? I simply threw out a statement that could have given validity to the gun having rights.
probably had a CWP.
While I agree to an extent, the position Will was found in makes it pretty clear the perp didn't reveal it and threaten him first. Probably just walked up and shot him. If Will had one under these situations, it wouldn't have mattered. Unfortunately people who should have them don't think the same way as the people that shouldn't.The story isn't whether the shooter should have or shouldn't have had a gun. The story is that the victim didn't have a gun. Of course, like Sas, he's a big guy who doesn't need one to defend himself.
It's really simple. These are the people that will get a gun no matter what laws are in place.
It's really simple. These are the people that will get a gun no matter what laws are in place. They are the dangerous and irresponsible type that people freak out about and try to categorize with law abiding, responsible gun owners. Disarm the responsible ones, and these pricks will still get theirs and continue to use them this way. Lunatics will always get their hands on a means to do harm. A few *******s used box cutters to hijack planes. I guess we should have banned anything with a sharp blade centuries ago.
Wanna bet?Well the gun has rights too. Was probably bought legally and the owner probably had a CWP.
WHAT????Nice try. Convicted felon who couldn't legally own a gun.
i LOL'dLooks like the police should have shot the father and son....I wish I could get a couple of million when someone I never knew got shot....
Well, that appears that he's innocent. Set him free,The perps lawyer says his client acted in self defense:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...wyer-claims-his-client-was-not-the-aggressor/
It sure is a relief we didn't waste tax dollars locking this non violent offender up for the 5 years. Imagine how much money we saved.................Shooter looks like an upstanding citizen to me.
Hayes has one previous arrest, on Aug. 1, 2010, court records show. Hayes was charged with illegal carrying of a weapon, illegal possession of codeine and possession of drug paraphernalia, among other charges. He pleaded guilty in June 2012 to a weapons charge and the possession of codeine, and received a 5-year prison sentence that was immediately suspended. But Hayes withdrew his guilty plea the following month, records show.
In June 2013, Hayes rejected a plea offer from prosecutors. Finally, in January 2014 he pleaded guilty to a reduced weapons charge and to a count of possession of drug paraphernalia. He received a suspended six-month sentence, records show.
Here's a strange twist to the story.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...murder-suggest-scenario-other-than-road-rage/
Dubbed an incident of road rage at first, theNew Orleans Advocate points out that Hayes sued the City of New Orleans in 2005 after police officers killed his father. Shortly before the automobile accident that resulted in Hayes shooting Smith and his wife, Smith and former Saints teammate Pierre Thomashad eaten dinner with Billy Ceravolo, one of the officers who shot Anthony Hayes and who was personally sued by Cardell Hayes.
Very, very interesting!Here's a strange twist to the story.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...murder-suggest-scenario-other-than-road-rage/
Dubbed an incident of road rage at first, theNew Orleans Advocate points out that Hayes sued the City of New Orleans in 2005 after police officers killed his father. Shortly before the automobile accident that resulted in Hayes shooting Smith and his wife, Smith and former Saints teammate Pierre Thomashad eaten dinner with Billy Ceravolo, one of the officers who shot Anthony Hayes and who was personally sued by Cardell Hayes.