- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,553
- 111,124
Founding Member
I was there. It was in the NE corner. I think TV20 had some video and it looked like his back hit just before the goal line. It was unreal. And the noise (like yuou said) was an explosion.I don't think there is any video of the James Jones catch because the game wasn't televised. You had to be there. But that might have been the first benchmark for loud in the stadium.
Darn good question.
Dubose was before my time.
My knee Jerk reaction would be to say Neal Anderson because he was so important to the offense for those teams.
Conversely I'd rule out any of Spurrier's backs because the only "danger" was them adding to an already lopsided score.
That's a damn good group of RBs but since you said "most dangerous" I'd reluctantly have to say Jeff Demps because of his speed once he got past the line he was in danger of scoring every time. Intersting to see what others say.
you got another one.................Emmitt. Silly poll. Might as well ask "who was the best defensive lineman, but you can't say 'Jack Youngblood' because I'm making up stupid ****."
Emmitt. Silly poll. Might as well ask "who was the best defensive lineman, but you can't say 'Jack Youngblood' because I'm making up stupid ****."
you got another one.................
Eric Rhett not getting much love. Only the leading rusher in UF history.............He was a badd azzz in more than a few games.
Did you even bother to read the OP? I specifically asked you to consider everyone else BECAUSE it is so lopsided. I added the "most dangerous" clause in an effort to make people think about their answer.
Did you even bother to read the OP? I specifically asked you to consider everyone else BECAUSE it is so lopsided. I added the "most dangerous" clause in an effort to make people think about their answer.
Then ask who the second best running back was, instead of pretending "dangerous" has some meaning that excludes him. That's not so hard.
And in response, Taylor had the best combination of speed and power, Rhett was easily the most powerful - the kind who run it 30 times a game and gets stronger, and Chandler the best combination of speed, fluidity, and athleticism.
Then ask who the second best running back was, instead of pretending "dangerous" has some meaning that excludes him. That's not so hard.
I loved what Jeff demps brought to the table for us, but it's baffling to see he got votes in this thread. He was basically a poor man's Bo Carroll for us. The simple answer is Fred ...hands down
Neal Anderson amazing run
Actually I saw every home game in person. A few bowl games, a few FLA-Ga games, the rest on TV. Have to admit I missed the Choak at Doak - I was in Cozumel that weekend. Spurrier's rushing yards usually came in the 4th qtr when the game was out of hand. Not that his backs weren't important, but the OP asked for "most dangerous" not named Emmitt. It would be real simple to say Fred Taylor being he's the best of the bunch but that would be a simple answer. That would be a simple thread for simple minds. Maybe you could start that thread. The OP worded the question differently so as to avoid the obvious answer.Did you actually watch any Spurrier-coached games? This is beyond absurd.
Lawrence Taylor would have caught him.