joeblow;n260012 said:
I see that I am the only one here that actually believes in America, where you are innocent until proven guilty. You, on the other hand, read something and think it's true because it was printed. Were you there? If not, you are just as ignorant as anyone else, and we have something called a jury that we have agreed is the final arbiter of innocence or guilt. Any lawyer knows that you can't "assume" anything. I'm sure there are idiotic FSU fans that feel like Treon Harris was also the recipient of "local" justice. As in the case of your rant, there is no evidence of that happening. I am not dumb enough to have a view on someone's guilt or innocence based on what I read in the paper, but I guess you are an exception, huh? If you know what happened, why haven't you went to the state's attorney to present yourself as a witness? You haven't? Well I guess you just have an opinion then that is as worthless as anyone else's, including mine. We'll know by September if Cook is guilty, until then none of you is doing anything but showing your lack of faith in America.
Stick to screwing up my order in the drive through and leave the law to people who understand it.
They say you should never try to teach a pig how to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig. I can't believe I'm actually going to try to educate a clown...
Here goes. Pay attention, son.
Remember how OJ was found not guilty of the crime? In a subsequent CIVIL case where the burden of proof was preponderance of evidence, he was found responsible for causing those deaths and was forced to pay millions in restitution.
So you see, not guilty is not the same as innocent.
That civil case was in an AMERICAN court too. Complete with AMERICAN law, an AMERICAN judge, and even an AMERICAN flag in the court room. They couldn't take away his freedom, but they took away his millions. You don't know this because you're dumb. If you were smart and understood stuff like this (you know, 7th grade civics) you might have gotten into a better school like UCF or USF or Sante Fe Community College. Sadly, you had to settle for everybody's "safe" school where folks don't understand simple concepts the rest of us learned in middle school. But that's OK. We can't all live in big houses. Somebody has to mow the lawns, clean the toilets, and bag the groceries. The world needs clowns like you to dig ditches and screw up orders in the drive through. The price we pay is when one of you forgets how dumb you are and tries to talk to the grown ups about things you don't understand.
Best advice I can give you is to know your limitations. Of course you won't listen. Because I'm trying to teach a pig how to sing. Anyway.
On to the case. We already know some of the evidence. We know the victim is an African American female (contrary to your point about identifying people not of your own race). We know she ended up with a fat lip after a confrontation with some of Jimbo's Boys. Did she punch herself? Is that your argument? C'mon clown. The victim identified Dalvin Cook as the one who dunnit.
Why would she lie? If it was Rudolph, why would she blame Cook instead of Rudolph? Makes no sense, does it?
But that's hard for you to understand given how little sense you have yourself.
Maybe that's why you keep putting onions on my quarter pounder despite my express instructions to the contrary.
Alex.