I don't know how it ever got to the point that we struggle to take kids from cowbell or Kentucky or Pitt orIndianaHeath basically said MSU is still in the lead so we’ll see
Really? did you just drink your way through the Muschamp and McElwain years?I don't know how it ever got to the point that we struggle to take kids from cowbell or Kentucky or Pitt orIndiana
There was no recruiting problems w Chump, other than getting him interested in anything but Bucks or DBs. He could land pretty much who he wanted he was just a dumazz about who he wanted.Really? did you just drink your way through the Muschamp and McElwain years?
Chump was always defense heavy, which I understand. Just couldn't understand his lack of interest on the OL. I think Mullen has done well at QB, other than vetting Jones better. You said it numerous times, there's really no reason for WR or RB's to come here. He just doesn't feature them.There was no recruiting problems w Chump, other than getting him interested in anything but Bucks or DBs
really says something that Chump did and can still land more talented receivers backs and quarterbacks than Mullins can.
there's no nothing I deal with it's more difficult dictate or type and to edit than this board
I visit this thread and Rivals only occasionally. Just saw that we’re up to #6 in the rankings. Pretty sure it was #10 the last time I checked, in October or early November.
Another idiotic contradiction. EJ was highly thought of and a priority for OSU. You can’t diminish that. Jalon Jones is a jerk but highly talented. Bad personality eval but his football skills were awesome. Finally, you say AR is the perfect QB for Mullen - tailormade. But now Chump is a better qb recruiter because his guys are top 100. So which is it - recruit guys you yourself think are perfect for the system or chase high profile guys that’s don’t fit? I think the latter would be bad recruiting but in donkey world who knows?There was no recruiting problems w Chump, other than getting him interested in anything but Bucks or DBs
really says something that Chump did and can still land more talented receivers backs and quarterbacks than Mullins can.
there's no nothing I deal with it's more difficult dictate or type and to edit than this board
There was no recruiting problems w Chump, other than getting him interested in anything but Bucks or DBs
Donk is like one of those robots who’s head explodes when it gets too much information. His BS contradictions are getting called out left and right so he’s getting more outlandish. He’ll eventually go back on vacation when it “does not compute” /robot voiceThis statement is completely contradictory. You can't say chump had no recruiting problems and then highlight his unbalanced classes. We had 7-8 OL when mac arrived and had no depth at LB.
Quit drunk posting.
there's no nothing I deal with it's more difficult dictate or type and to edit than this board
This interface has some weird shyt going on if you are typing from a phone.Promise me you won’t drive.
Sure does. But its weird - I use a wireless keyboard for my iPad and experience no issues. I believe its still on the mobile version of the site but acts completely differently. Maybe I’m wrong and its using the desktop site?This interface has some weird shyt going on if you are typing from a phone.
I always go through the browser on the phone, usually chrome. Im sure it is something to do with that.Sure does. But its weird - I use a wireless keyboard for my iPad and experience no issues. I believe its still on the mobile version of the site but acts completely differently. Maybe I’m wrong and its using the desktop site?
I use Chrome on my phone and never sound as drunk as you do.I always go through the browser on the phone, usually chrome. Im sure it is something to do with that.
Really? did you just drink your way through the Muschamp and McElwain years?