It's a terrible comparison. Landing top classes at Clemson is unbelievable. It's never happened before. It's a small state with no talent so has to go steal each and every recruit. Dabo runs a wide open offense and lured 5 star game changers like CJ Spiller, Sammy Watkins, Mike Bellamy, Artavis Scott, Ray Ray McCloud FROM FLORIDA because our own archaic offense was too much for them to stomach. He isn't just the best coach of the last decade there, he is the best coach ever.
Well, counselor, let's not gloss over the fact that Dabo is now in his NINTH YEAR at Clemson.
To my mind, a comparison of Mac vs Dabo after TWO years is a reasonable comparison. But you could also say How bout UM after 2 at Florida, or Harbaugh after 2 at Michigan, and most every coach looks bad in comparison to them.
I'm not going to spend the time to try to pull up any info on Clemson's recruiting prowess in his early years, but I'm going to assume that as the talent level improved, so did Clemson's record. After 9 years, it's now at a very high level, on both sides of the ball. But it wasn't that way in the early years.
BTW, in Year 3 Dabo went 6-7. Nevertheless, he was allowed to keep trying.
I'm not saying that Mac is clearly on track to be successful here. I'm just saying it's a "fairly debatable" point as to whether he is definitely off-track after two years. There's some ambiguity about the evidence.
(And depending on one's sentiments, each of us as members of the non-voting peanut gallery may or may not think it's appropriate to grade him on a bit of curve, due to the roster he inherited, the Will Grier situation, and/or this year's injuries.)
We'd for sure all feel a lot more optimistic if we can land a couple more 4* or 5* DTs and LBs on NSD.