- Oct 15, 2014
- 12,191
- 16,985
Ole Miss upset . Even if Grier audibled all plays to other plays (that could be sour grapes by Grier as I find it hard to believe a freshman would audible out of all the plays) that was Mac's newly installed offense. Grier was UF's last quick thinking QB with talent.No trying to pile on here but can you name the time he didn’t call a terrible game ?
Ole Miss upset . Even if Grier audibled all plays to other plays (that could be sour grapes by Grier as I find it hard to believe a freshman would audible out of all the plays) that was Mac's newly installed offense.
I dont believe that Grier changed all the calls as a freshman in a newly installed system. I do believe he changed some to fit the opposing defense. Good QBs do that.He called a good game but the QB changed all the calls ?
Really? Donks making that argument two posts above you. And no one now argues that Mac could judge talent or recruit.No one in his right mind is going to argue against the notion that talent can make a difference. The counterargument is that, irony of ironies, Mac was a poor judge of talent and he couldn't recruit worth a crap to begin with.
Nobody wants to hear what a poor whiddle victim Mac was when he made the awful mess he sat in.
And speaking of bait, you just fell for the big chum. Score one for Jas.
The offense he ran at Bama was grossly subpar if you take into account the ridiculous talent they had.To be accurate , when Mac had top talent that Saban had recruited and developed Mac lead that offense to 2 national championships. Mac lead an offense that was good enough to beat a Tebow led UF team in the SEC championship game. Mac did not eff up the offense at Bama when he had a stud OL and a quick thinking QB.
What do you think happened the first five games and the game after that?I dont believe that Grier changed all the calls.
If don't know who you are referring to but Donks is one of the drama queens I have on ignore.Arguing ad hominem helps identify the loser in a discussion.
Really? Donks making that argument two posts above you. And no one now argues that Mac could judge talent or recruit.
Arguing ad hominem helps identify the loser in a discussion.
Really? Donks making that argument two posts above you. And no one now argues that Mac could judge talent or recruit.
To be fair Bama lost to UF with those players in the SEC championship game the year prior to Mac. New Bama OC Mac got our attention when the Bama offense came out throwing when UF loaded up to stop the run. Saban got his first Bama national championship when he turned over the keys to the offense to new OC Mac. Of course Mac did not develop or recruit those Bama offensive players.The offense he ran at Bama was grossly subpar if you take into account the ridiculous talent they had.
I can't respond anymore because I killed myself.
I can't respond anymore because I killed myself.
You have gone full fvkktard.Arguing ad hominem helps identify the loser in a discussion.
Really? Donks making that argument two posts above you. And no one now argues that Mac could judge talent or recruit.
Im suing his estate. You can join me.The timing of this is admittedly poor, so I apologize. But what does that mean for my Oxbucks?
The fallacy in your argument is a variation of the "either/or" fallacy. Either Mac was a bad coach or he wasn't. Everyone agrees he was a bad coach. So you conclude that talent can't help a bad coachYou have gone full fvkktard.
Im truly beginning to believe you are an absolute idiot. I used to think you were desperately trying to rationalize your years of miscalculations and your insistence that all of Mssippi was laughing at us for firing the world's best coach.... then I began to think you were just slow or perhaps of desperately poor reading comprehension. Youre way past that.
No offense. Youre still one of my favorite chromosome challenged Mssippians.
The fallacy in your argument is a variation of the "either/or" fallacy.