I agree that Muschamp was not very good with talking about UF. He led fans down a primrose path full of thorns by overselling how good the team was. I remember the SEC Media days last year when Muschamp and the players with him had the wrong attitude to present to the public. I remember how different Alabama and Florida were. Alabama, coming off an eleven win season, was very humble. At the other end of the spectrum was UF, coming off a four win season. UF was very cocky and acted like they were coming off a title. Remember Muschamp's mantra about UF being a "very good" team and that Driskel was going to be a great quarterback? That kind of unwarranted optimism filtered down to the players. The best example of that was when Hargreaves proclaimed that Jeff Driskel was the "best quarterback in America." It's easier to keep your job if you poor mouth your team, then when thy succeed, you look like you're a genius coach. If you take the route that Muschamp took, saying how great your players are, and they don't measure up, you look like you can't coach at all. It's ok to brag if you can back it up, something Spurrier was able to do. But it's a lot safer to poor mouth your team and praise the other. One of the masters at that was Vince Dooley. I recall all the times when he bemoaned about how his poor little Bulldogs didn't ave a chance against the mighty Gators. We all learned what a crock that was.
From what I've seen so far, it looks like McElwain is somewhere in between, he's brash by saying his dog could play quarterback, yet he's not making any kind of statement about this team. If I was him, knowing I have a six year contract, I wouldn't say anything to make UF fans think UF is a great team, just tell stories of doom and woe, like he is about the offensive line right now. He'll be a genius that way, if he succeeds, wow what a coach. If he doesn't do great, well what did you expect, a miracle?