- Jun 19, 2014
- 21,590
- 48,420
Founding Member
TLDRI'll explain it again, more slowly.
Using "losses" does a couple of things:
First: it normalizes comparisons between different eras. A 10 win season was big deal back when we played only 11 regular season games, no SECCG and one bowl game. Spurrier won 10 games in 1991 as did Mac in 2015 but Spurrier did it in only 12 games whereas Mac had 14. Spurrier's 10 wins are a helluva a lot more impressive than Mac's 10 wins.
Second: it eliminates the auto cupcake win that everybody gets (except Chump of course). I acknowledge sometimes it's not a cupcake (Miami for ex).
Third: it eliminates the variable of making the SECCG. You can't lose it if you don't go to it. I'll leave it up to you to decide if it's better to go and lose or not go at all.
Fourth: it eliminates coaches/teams philosophies in bowl games. Again using Spurrier as an example he was 6-5 in bowl games. Now are you really going to use that as an argument that Spurrier was a bad coach?
Fifth: We generally play the same level of talent in the regular season. SECCG and Bowl games skew the comparison.
So let's look at average regular season losses between the coaches:
SOS: 1.6/yr
Meyer: 2.1/yr
Zook: 4/yr
Chump: 5/yr
Sounds about right doesn't it? Big difference between SOS/Meyer and Zook/Chump isn't there?
But let's look at season wins for comparison:
Meyer: 10.8/yr
SOS: 10.2/yr
Zook: 7.6/yr
Chump: 7.25/yr
So that looks about right again EXCEPT Spurrier played one less game a year. Spurrier's 10.2 is more impressive than Meyer's 10.8. So as a quick and dirty comparison regular season losses is a pretty good measure.
So where does Mac stand in that comparison. Well personally I think two seasons is a little short to compare but he's
Reg season losses 2.5/yr
Whole season wins 9.5/yr
Now here is probably the hard part for you. It's only one statistic. A quick and dirty one. Statistics are meaningless without context.
Bowl game records, records against rivals, record against ranked teams, etc. would complete the picture.
Here's another thing that's probably hard for you. It's possible for there to be contradictory stats. Everything is not binary. Spurrier has a great record, lots of SEC championships, an NC and one helluva a lot of offensive records but a terrible record in bowls and against F$U. But it's comical to watch the dumpers go ballistic when a stat favors Mac - which is why I do it.
You take yourself way too seriously.