- Jun 16, 2014
- 959
- 5
Founding Member
Potential bad news on this question - however it makes perfect sense as to why this hearing is even happening.- I have read, but don't know if it is accurate, that regardless of the panel's decision and the recommendation that Harding suggests ( yes suggests) if ruled guilty, that (ta-da!) the president of FSU has the final say on what sanctions,is given, if any. I have also seen speculation that it is a dean that decides on the sanction after recommendation..
I think the panel usually would include dean, maybe president,( seems like their were 3 school administrators plus student reps) and they recused themselves and set up this "outside" panel so it would remove suspicion of favoritism. Harding seems to have an ethical reputation among attorneys and people who have met him ( take that for whatever it's worth) I think FSU hopes his rep witl cover their decision.
Oh, and when Cornwell was whining about no time for client to prepare, there was an article that said the details of the hearing were to be secret. I don't know if that is accurate either, but it is a hearing involving accusations about and by students ( ex student), so that might be true. If so, we may never know what the victim said, what sanction was recommended, and maybe not even their decision on guilt.
My conclusion has become, this is merely to extremely belatedly give the appearance of satisfying a Title IX requirement and the appearance of an attempt at impartiality,( this we all knew) while maintaining control of the outtcome. As has been mentioned, since winston will be gone, the function of doing this ( besides trying to appease title IX and improve the public perception of FSU a bit) would be to suggest winston is innocent and suggest the victim's story is a lie or weak, found so by an ethical judge, in order to sway public opinion, assist crab boy's NFL draft chances, and give weight to winston's arguments in a civil case ( also potentially affect juror opinion prior),
I think the panel usually would include dean, maybe president,( seems like their were 3 school administrators plus student reps) and they recused themselves and set up this "outside" panel so it would remove suspicion of favoritism. Harding seems to have an ethical reputation among attorneys and people who have met him ( take that for whatever it's worth) I think FSU hopes his rep witl cover their decision.
Oh, and when Cornwell was whining about no time for client to prepare, there was an article that said the details of the hearing were to be secret. I don't know if that is accurate either, but it is a hearing involving accusations about and by students ( ex student), so that might be true. If so, we may never know what the victim said, what sanction was recommended, and maybe not even their decision on guilt.
My conclusion has become, this is merely to extremely belatedly give the appearance of satisfying a Title IX requirement and the appearance of an attempt at impartiality,( this we all knew) while maintaining control of the outtcome. As has been mentioned, since winston will be gone, the function of doing this ( besides trying to appease title IX and improve the public perception of FSU a bit) would be to suggest winston is innocent and suggest the victim's story is a lie or weak, found so by an ethical judge, in order to sway public opinion, assist crab boy's NFL draft chances, and give weight to winston's arguments in a civil case ( also potentially affect juror opinion prior),