Uh-oh: Mullen calls win over Alabama

[-THE DUDE-]

Eh so we give Bama motivation to drop 70 on us instead of maybe 63? Who cares

 

[LagoonGator68]

He has fallen off the cliff in the last week and is quickly becoming Sharky level complete buffoon.

Mullets is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he is definitely not the buffoon y’all are try to make him out to be. I can’t believe he thought it was even marginally ok to sit Pitts last game given all the possibilities that were on the line even with this double dogshiit excuse of a defense. He may not read this stuff, but I double garontee his young son does. It wouldn’t surprise me one iota to see him take the first train out of Clarksville if given an opportunity...

 

[Swamp Donkey]

Mullets is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he is definitely not the buffoon y’all are try to make him out to be. I can’t believe he thought it was even marginally ok to sit Pitts last game given all the possibilities that were on the line even with this double dogshiit excuse of a defense. He may not read this stuff, but I double garontee his young son does. It wouldn’t surprise me one iota to see him take the first train out of Clarksville if given an opportunity...

You habe to be a totall buffoon to run option w Trash and Leak and allow Grantham to survive.

Total buffoon.

 

[LagoonGator68]

You habe to be a totall buffoon to run option w Trash and Leak and allow Grantham to survive.

Total buffoon.

So, Moroon, tell us who to replace him with.

 

[78]

He kind of called a win.

 

[Swamp Donkey]

He kind of called a win.

Further proof he doesnt look at game film for prep.

 

[78]

Further proof he doesnt look at game film for prep.

Or think much before he opens his mouth.

 

[GBHOR]

Further proof he doesnt look at game film for prep.

You're not playing the opponent, you're playing the course.... wrong thread sorry.

Dan doesn't need film.... He's Dan.

 

[CU-UF]

Aw hell, I like it. Why the heck not. Its a no-lose situation. He cant say we are going to getting slapped around. And if he stays silent there really is no benefit. But if he is brash like that, it might fire his players up and if by some great miracle they do win, he will look like a genius.

 

[78]

I recall Custer saying he needed to hit the head before Little Bighorn.

 

[Swamp Donkey]

Aw hell, I like it. Why the heck not. Its a no-lose situation. .

It is a lose lose situation. After he gets assraped by an elephant he then gets to looks as stupid as Mr. "We re Going To Kick In the Doors in Atlanta" Mc Sharkelstain.

 

[soflagator]

His full quote.

“We’ll think abut that on Saturday night after we win,” Mullen said at a Thursday press conference previewing the SEC title game. “I think LSU made it when there were only two teams with two losses, if I’m not mistaken. Does that sound about right? It was back in one of those years with the BCS. Maybe I’m off on that one. … We’ll worry about winning on Saturday night because that’s all we can control. What happens after that, we’ll see what happens next.”

Definite tar. I'm on the fence about the feathers. But that type of talk is simply dreadful and can't be tolerated.

 

[FireFoley]

 

[soflagator]

I recall Custer saying he needed to hit the head before Little Bighorn.

You probably read it in Harper's Weekly just days after.

 

[oxrageous]

Aw hell, I like it. Why the heck not. Its a no-lose situation. He cant say we are going to getting slapped around. And if he stays silent there really is no benefit. But if he is brash like that, it might fire his players up and if by some great miracle they do win, he will look like a genius.

It’s much more likely to fire up the opposition than his own team.

 

[oxrageous]

Think there is some truth to that. We'll cross that bridge when we get there is what he's essentially saying. Basically any hypothetical playoff talk is irrelevant if we lose, so why even get into it. If there was any hint that he was calling for a win, I'm quite certain there would've been follow-ups from every reporter in the room(see "pack the Swamp" debacle). The fact that they didn't tells me it wasn't said in such a way.

Nice try here. He could have said, “we’ll see what happens IF we win”.....instead it was WHEN we win. He knew exactly what he was saying.

 

[itsgr82bag8r]

Wouldn't have a coach that didn't expect to win.

I agree with this. WTF would anyone expect him to say if he's asked about the chances to win the game? Should he say he expects us to lose? Let me answer that for you: FK NO.

When he addresses the players, should he just be clear that despite working their asses off he expects them to lose? GTFO.

 

[Swamp Donkey]

They dont need to be fired up. They score whatever number they want on Grantham. 40, 60, 80, even 100 bc Dullen cant even stall enough to keep them from doing it.

I'm really hoping they get bored quickly.

 

[oxrageous]

I agree with this. WTF would anyone expect him to say if he's asked about the chances to win the game? Should he say he expects us to lose? Let me answer that for you: FK NO.

When he addresses the players, should he just be clear that despite working their asses off he expects them to lose? GTFO.

Are you hammered? You act like he has to say at least one extreme or the other. He doesn't. Of course a coach should/would never say they expect to lose. However, declaring victory to the media, especially as a huge underdog, is retarded.

 

[MatthewM.]

He’s basically the high school nerd that became successful doing some nerd **** after college. Little does he realize everyone still thinks he’s a nerd and the hot chick that married him for his money is out getting some bbc on the side.