- Jun 10, 2014
- 20,185
- 41,497
Founding Member
I consider you third tier.I consider Kirby second tier.
That makes ours third tier.
I consider you third tier.I consider Kirby second tier.
That makes ours third tier.
This. There‘s Urbs, Dabo, Saban and then everyone else. Peterson isn’t anything special.Why? He did great at a lower level school and did reasonably well at Washington, but not as well as Mullen has so far at UF. Put Petersen at MSU and what would be better/different from Mullen?
That makes ours third tier.
Completely disagree. Washington I’m located in Microsoft’s backyard. The Gates Foundation is their largest donor. Now, that’s not solely going to athletics, like Nike, it’s still extremely competitive. I’d hardly say they are the Mizzu of their conference. They lost a lot of talent to draft last year.
Like the PAC-12, the SEC has some polar opposites. I’d put Washington as an Auburn or LSU or Florida of the SEC.If not Mizzou, who would you compare them to SEC wise?
Like the PAC-12, the SEC has some polar opposites. I’d put Washington as an Auburn or LSU or Florida of the SEC.
He's more special than Mullen.This. There‘s Urbs, Dabo, Saban and then everyone else. Peterson isn’t anything special.
Meh. Both are good coaches, but not great. Neither has proven to be great at recruiting.He's more special than Mullen.
I'd like to see Petersen coach a powerhouse school. Washington ain't it.Meh. Both are good coaches, but not great. Neither has proven to be great at recruiting.
I'd like to see Petersen coach a powerhouse school. Washington ain't it.
They’ve won a national championship more recently than Georgia. But then again, so have BYU and Georgia Tech.I'd like to see Petersen coach a powerhouse school. Washington ain't it.
They’ve won a national championship more recently than Georgia. But then again, so have BYU and Georgia Tech.
I think you are painting the picture of his coaching status in a very different light. I posted an article on page 2 of this thread that explains his philosophy. I guess you could look at it and say he shied away from big jobs, but he believed there was more to life than football. He insisted his staf go home by dark and be with their families, he didn’t believe in paying players, he didn’t believe in cutting corners in recruiting. Perhaps all of that would be necessary to win at big time programs but it’s also what has driven other coaches to leave. Spurrier didn’t like it. Stoops got burned out. Meyer had heartburn. But to say he wants to be middle management is false in my book.That’s the problem though. He won’t. It was documented that he had a chance to take over USC, but declined. Those who know him say he didn’t want the pressure of big time job, and preferred to be in a second tier location, specifically Seattle where there is a pro team to keep some of the pressure and attention off of him. How is that special?
I think he’s a very good coach, and has done well wherever he goes. But he’s also a guy that is perfectly content to win most games, play in a bowl and enjoy life. Nothing wrong with that. But I’ll take someone who at least has the balls to take on a big job and wants to win it all, whether he does or not. The whole “10 wins forever” fear that some of you have with Mullen would be almost guaranteed with a guy like Peterson. But again, it’s moot because he wants to be in middle management.
I think you are painting the picture of his coaching status in a very different light. I posted an article on page 2 of this thread that explains his philosophy. I guess you could look at it and say he shied away from big jobs, but he believed there was more to life than football. He insisted his staf go home by dark and be with their families, he didn’t believe in paying players, he didn’t believe in cutting corners in recruiting. Perhaps all of that would be necessary to win at big time programs but it’s also what has driven other coaches to leave. Spurrier didn’t like it. Stoops got burned out. Meyer had heartburn. But to say he wants to be middle management is false in my book.
Likewise, In-laws are huge Huskies but I don’t think the hammer was coming down after this season’s record, just a set back. Didn’t he lose a bunch last year early to the draft?Wife's a Husky and we've been up to a couple of games this year and their last two bowl games and the passion by the fan base is there. That might have been some of the reason he left, he may have been the architect of his own demise. After early success, with some really talented teams at UW, expectations were sky high trust me. With Eason coming in they remained high, too high I told my wife, and when they had the season they had this year, fan base wasn't happy. Trust me I live with one.