T REX;n260717 said:
I posted the number of four stars we've signed going back ten years.
T REX;n260772 said:
Most of your post is about 5 star kids. Do the number breakdown on the 4 star kids. I already did it and it's ugly. Feel free to use my research as I went back ten years. Recruiting is suffering massively contrary to your best Goebbels piece. Four star kids were always the highest % of our class for the most part. Find my posts. ...I did the breakdown already. Your puff piece was worthless.
Challenge accepted, though I'll sidestep the nazi reference. So, I ran a search on your post in hopes of finding your research on past recruiting classes. Unsurprisingly, searching for 'class' by 'T REX' yields plenty of posts about 'low class' and a lack of class (the nazi reference makes more sense). But the football relevant ones didn't provide me this research you claim (please help me if I missed it). Instead, what I found was the following:
In reference to the bulk of our classes being 3star kids, we have your opinion but no linked facts to back them up.
T REX;n231815 said:
Depends on how many we take in a given year. We should have a nice mix of a couple 5's, a bunch of fours and then you fill the class out with 3's. I hate Muschamp more and more(if that is possible). He ruined our brand.
In answer to the 2015 class being a transition class, when transition classes typically suck.
To be honest...this class would have been awful even with Muschamp staying. Not much we can do about it now. That ship sailed long ago.
Another on the 2015 class, admitting we'll have to fill it with less than awesome talent
We need bodies. They will have to fill the class with 2 & 3 stars. They don't have a choice. The previous regime didn't recruit properly across the board.
Again, about the 2015 class, but admitting the WM debacle will have a lasting impact in recruiting
I've made it a point to avoid referencing that but when we are talking about the current recruiting class, I really feel it is relevant. No reason for us to be in such bad shape. This will affect the next three years...negatively.
Again, about the 2015 class, but this time as a comment from beating the dead Foley horse about retaining WM too long
Recruiting is in the crapper. Do you now why? This class is going to handicap the new guy. Instead of Foley doing the right thing he screwed us. Sorry you want to ignore it or sweep it under the rug. Let's call it for what it is...
There's more like that - a lot of bashing Foley (I'm not arguing his responsibility in this mess), a lot of the 2015 class sucking because of WM and how JMac will struggle to get anything in 2015. There wasn't a point in going further back past the firing of WM. But since then, I can't find this supposed research on how 4 stars made the bulk of our recruiting classes. So, if you did this research, can you link me to it? Not calling you a liar, just saying your full of sht about what you've supposedly researched and posted.
Now that we have that out there, let's look at your question about four star kids - I'll stick to 247 for the sake of consistency, rather than bouncing with espn or rivals recruiting boards. Looking at the top 10 team, you are correct that there are few five star kids to go around - your point on my initial post is accepted. And your position that most of our past classes have been four-star heavy may be true, or at least have some truth to it. Just a quick look at the current top 10 bears that out somewhat, in that the top classes have an overall balance of 3-4 star commits with very few 2 star kids (assume these schools don't have 0-1 star kids making up that commit total).
That list alone shows and 93 4-stars and 80 3-stars. That site makes it difficult to figure out how big the pool of each class is, but it appears there are over 300 of the 4-star kids currently out there. Only 27 of the 5-star kids available. Likely gobs and gobs of 3-star kids, and I'm sure you'll say there is an order of magnitude more 2-star kids available (and we're trying to sign them all!).
A few pointed questions for you, if you're willing to enlighten us with your grumpy insights:
1 - where is this research you posted about our past 10 classes being mostly 4-star kids (whether you actually researched it, and posted it, or not I'm willing to bet you are right in that we were 4-star heavy in that we had high class rankings under Meyer and Muscant).
2 - Do we have scholarships still available, or have we filled our roster with 2-3 star kids and have no room to go up?
3 - Do rankings for kids go up over the course of their senior year, or is the ranking they have RIGHT NOW what they'll be come NSD?
4 - All those kids not committed today, or possibly committed to other schools but flipable ddepending on our on-field performance this season, do we have NO chance at them right now? At the end of the season? By NSD? You may say we don't have them now so we suck. Can you acknowledge that nobody else has them, and we have a shot, so we don't know if we suck yet?
4 - With those high ranked classes in the past decade, what have we done with them? Acknowledging Myere's two NC's, what else do we have to show (not belittling those at all, god love them). Specifically, what do we have for the past 5 yrs classes in terms of four star kids and on field performance? The comeback might to be 'how many went on to the NFL' as an indicator of player quality, but the key point here is our winning and losing in NCAA contests. Having great kids 3 deep, either in the wrong position or in a scheme that doesn't utilize them, doesn't do a damn thing for the kid, the team, or the program. So, to turn a paragraph back into a Q&A, what exactly have we got to show for all those high ranked 4-star loaded classes in the past five years?
You admitted JMac was hamstrung by WM for the 2015 class - no relationships and a short window to sign - so the push was for bodies. And you acknowledge there will be a lasting black eye for the new staff to overcome in terms of recruiting. But you don't seem to be cutting them any slack in overcoming the past regime's mistakes. 2015 was just get bodies. 2016, IMO, will be getting the right bodies (character and buy in) for the program (may not be all stars, but they are the right kids for JMac to build HIS program with. 2017 is when the rest of the world sees what he can do and it will be a case of getting the BEST bodies for the program (character, buy in, AND skill set).
I'm not saying we're going to be all-star awesome. I'm not even saying we have the possibility to be a top program again until I see the coaches getting it done on the field and the kids starting to come. But you seem set on asserting we are way bad now and will continue to be, with no hope of getting better. Has law truly brought you that deep into the darkside?