- Jun 23, 2020
- 1,574
- 2,667
Wow. This woman… but hey, it’s CNN.
Since we know she voted guilty, isn't this an admission of malfeasance in office? Can the Goldmans come after them?
The family was known around our parts, lovingly, as the “White-Trashians.”man, sofla with some world class trolling in this thread
although i will say, kourtney WAS the hottest (emphasis on was) but they all look horrible now.
Trolling? More like, "a cry for help!" When you throw all this Kardashian talk in with all the 311 references, you tell me what's going on????man, sofla with some world class trolling in this thread
although i will say, kourtney WAS the hottest (emphasis on was) but they all look horrible now.
Trolling? More like, "a cry for help!" When you throw all this Kardashian talk in with all the 311 references, you tell me what's going on????
Great.... just GREAT! You know what kind of people know a lot about SHOES?!?!?!?I expected to get some “wtf”s from that initial post, especially from @Bernardo de la Paz. It’s not a popular take, and I get his point. Bruno Maglis really aren’t that high of quality Italian shoes anymore.
Great.... just GREAT! You know what kind of people know a lot about SHOES?!?!?!?
I have THREE pairs of these bad boys!Smart people, people who have to wear dress shoes, and virtually all Eastern European pop stars.
I have THREE pairs of these bad boys!
"Moscow Rules" buddy... Moscow Rules...Steel toes I see. Nice. Has a certain masculine charm while also saying if it has to go down here in the streets, it’s going down right here in the streets.
Shh, leave em alone.
I dont think beyond taking a bribe or something that you would ever see a charge against a juror and regardless the statute ran decades ago, likely.It could be grounds for juror misconduct and/or perjury charges; but the ability for the State to do much about it is limited once the jury is discharged.
Criminal charges of jurors for nullification reasons are exceedingly rare--could only find two examples and both were dismissed.
I have heard that a few weeks prior to his trial OJ stopped taking a certain medication he had been prescribed and his hands swelled up considerably. Now, I don't know if this was true but it is definitely plausible...Not sure why anybody would still think he's guilty after that glove didn't fit.