well now that zach is discussing it we can be sure it wont happen
Gator Blue looks good on him at least... of course Gator blue looks good on everyone
It would be astounding if Scott Frost is spurning God knows how many huge offers to stay at UCF. I find it difficult to believe.
I don't know what I'd do if we hired Kelly. He's been my dream candidate for several years.
Exactly. He had a helluva first year. They were moving on in the playoffs his first year if not for a last second loss by a Saints FG. His problem was he couldn't get a decent QB. Nick Foles traded for Sam Bradford who it turned out was made of glass. Then he went to a team where there was no hope. A team who just got their first win this season at home by beating another team with 1 win.He didn’t really fail imho. He over micro managed the eagles, but still left with a 26-21. Not terrible for a first time nfl coach.
The 49ers are beyond messed up and they were so before he even took over
when I mentioned Frost they said that the Florida Board of Governors would be against schools within their domain poaching each others head coaches.
That's absurd.I attended a UAA net worker last week and visited with a couple of Bull Gators. We talked about the coaching situation and when I mentioned Frost they said that the Florida Board of Governors would be against schools within their domain poaching each others head coaches.
That's absurd.
That's absurd.
Yes...the SEC is standing on the tracks and the train is coming through, buttheadSo this is really happening, eh?
I wasn't saying YOU were absurd, Don.Thanks for your opinion.
I wasn't saying YOU were absurd, Don.
Ok, since it "appears" to be Chip Kelly....I was around for the Pell years. We were all happy about the winning, upgrade of facilities, recruiting, and then come to find out, he did not do it ethically. This is what worries me about Chip Kelly. Can anyone enlighten me why he got slammed by the NCAA for show cause? They do not hand those out casually...in fact the NCAA is so spineless that for them to issue Show Cause, Kelly had to have done something VERY egregious! Looking forward to hearing what shenanigans he did and why we think he won't change his stripes and bring down (further) our program. I want our program to start winning again, but I also do not want another Pell.
I think you guys need to do a little research on this to ease your mind. Seriously, comparing this to Pell is silly. The only thing found against Kelly was lack of control over an assistant and the infractions were very minor. They lost 1, yes 1 scholarship a year for 3 years.Ok, since it "appears" to be Chip Kelly....I was around for the Pell years. We were all happy about the winning, upgrade of facilities, recruiting, and then come to find out, he did not do it ethically. This is what worries me about Chip Kelly. Can anyone enlighten me why he got slammed by the NCAA for show cause? They do not hand those out casually...in fact the NCAA is so spineless that for them to issue Show Cause, Kelly had to have done something VERY egregious! Looking forward to hearing what shenanigans he did and why we think he won't change his stripes and bring down (further) our program. I want our program to start winning again, but I also do not want another Pell.
That's the answer I was trying to come up with.Someone can add or correct if I remembered wrong...but essentially.....
Kelly who did not like to recruit at Oregon (no secret now) hired a recruiting service to find prospects (which is/was legal). This recruiting service decided at some point to pay a couple of players to sign with Oregon (illegal). Instead of cooperating with the NCAA Kelly bolted and I think an assistant got pegged with a little more of the fallout. So Kelly didn't actually do the bad stuff but was in charge. Shouldn't need a recruiting service at FL for sure.
I think the show clause was more severe because Kelly was "in charge" of hiring the recruiting service and he basically said screw you to the NCAA.