I kind of like this new Threat with a little more hot sauce added.
Good sir, as I recall you have gone to law school. UF Law in fact. I'm hazy as to whether or not you have passed the bar but no matter. I commend you for the accomplishment. The study of law no doubt requires superior comprehension and reasoning skills.
And yet, you incessantly fail to demonstrate these abilities. I presume that latent alcohol fetal syndrome has finally presented itself. Mom it seems, just couldn't lay off the two-for-one margarita specials at Chi-Chi's, could she? I did not explicitly or implicitly imply a correlation between a coach's winning % and doing so with his players. I present numbers. Or more accurately I painstakingly tabulate numbers for the edification of the ungrateful collective
you. Honest numbers. Numbers that don't lie to you like that bitch Sara that said she was going out of town to visit her sick Aunt but instead you caught her sleeping with Mike from Accounting. But I digress.
So I give you numbers and with it the rights of free use. Do what you will with them, and that whore Sara. The Blue Chip theory was brought up and it spiked my curiosity. That's all. No point or argument was intended. I just wished to know how each team stacked up. However once the data is collated one can look for patterns, anomalies, etc. I simply point out these curiosities. They're numbers. They don't like....... like that slut Sara.
To answer your earlier question, seriously is simple math that far out of your wheelhouse, Chump's 2 year record was 18-8 69%. Coincidentally that is also the average Blue Chip percentage.