- Sep 8, 2014
- 25,454
- 59,483
I’ve asked the same question but never got a response.
I assumed that adding lacrosse would enable UF to offer a few more schollies in baseball or men’s track but apparently the scholly numbers in those sports are limited by the NCAA so I have no idea how this impacts Title IV or why we added the sport if there was no ancillary benefit other than the previous AD loves the sport
Title IX says you're supposed to have an equal number of men & woman on scholarship. But as we all know, football throws off those numbers in a big way. That's why we have woman's soccer, lacrosse, gymnastics, and volleyball and no men's teams. When we added the 12th game Foley said the revenue from the extra home game was specifically earmarked to start/fund the woman's lacrosse team.
I have no issue w/ spending money on the non-revenue sports. But the fact we don't have a stand-alone while we're building first class multi-million dollar facilities for the non-revenue sports is ridiculous. And we're 12 years removed from any sort of football championship, just after the AD stated "we're not getting into an arms race" - and he wasn't kidding either! Like I said earlier, we probably could have built a very nice ball park for half of what they're spending.