- Aug 14, 2018
- 10,768
- 20,655
There's no math that adds up to what you'd have these morons believe, which is that wanting to expand the playoffs is an outlier opinion held by, "a couple of azzhats."
What's your best argument against expanding the CFP to eight teams? (Poll!)
- Thread starter G. Gordon Gator
- Start date
- Aug 25, 2014
- 6,357
- 7,087
lol. Clemson won by 6 points in a come-from-behind victory and needed a pick in the end zone to secure the win. To suggest that the best team was obvious before the game was played is ludicrous.
If we had played the top two ranked teams against each other, it would've been Ohio State vs. LSU. The team that earned the right to play LSU by beating Ohio State last night, #3 Clemson, would not have a shot at the title under the old way of doing things.
Instead of admitting that, you're claiming the old BCS system would've gotten it right by ranking Clemson #2 in the first place?
Where did I suggest the best team was OBVIOUS before the game was played?
Also, it seems you weren’t aware, but Clemson was favored to win the game against Ohio State by about 2 points...and not only did they win, but they covered the spread. So while it wasn’t a lock (or OBVIOUS to use your words) that Clemson would win, it was expected they’d do so in a close game...and that’s what happened,
- Aug 25, 2014
- 6,357
- 7,087
- Aug 28, 2014
- 16,541
- 26,097
Losing by any other name is still losing.
BTW you created the poll, make the voters visible.
- Aug 20, 2018
- 16,979
- 21,201
I'd like 8 Teams...So many scream about the season length yet when is the NC Game?
I would like to have 6 Power Conferences 84- - 96 teams.
Move the remaining teams into the FCS.
6 Conference Champions + 2 at large
If nothing else...I would like fewer Bowl Games and no FCS vs FBS Games
I would like to have 6 Power Conferences 84- - 96 teams.
Move the remaining teams into the FCS.
6 Conference Champions + 2 at large
If nothing else...I would like fewer Bowl Games and no FCS vs FBS Games
- Aug 14, 2018
- 10,768
- 20,655
Why, so you can harass them? Obviously once you make a poll anonymous you can't flip a switch and expose who voted for what. That would kind of defeat the purpose of having anonymous polls.
Here's all you need to know about who voted: All the most intelligent posters who don't suffer from any developmental disorders voted for Option 3, "Expand it to 8 teams," which was the runaway leader from among the six choices given.
Coming in a distant second with Option 1, "Leave it the %#^@ alone," were the small-minded knuckleheads with a complete lack of foresight and vision who think this year "proved" that we don't need an 8-team playoff, "because there weren't even four great teams." :rolleyes: It reminds me of a running joke in my family about the response my Dad gave when my Mom proposed that we buy a waffle iron: "What do we need a waffle iron for? We never eat waffles!"
Yeah, Dad, see, um, the reason we never... oh, never mind.
The REAL geniuses, though, are the ones who voted for Option 5, "Eliminate the CFP and go back to #1 vs. #2," when we just finished a season with three unbeaten P5 conference champions!
So in other words, they would've been fine with #1 LSU playing #2 Ohio State for the MNC and letting that be the end of it.Oops.
- Aug 20, 2018
- 16,979
- 21,201
Why, so you can harass them? Obviously once you make a poll anonymous you can't flip a switch and expose who voted for what. That would kind of defeat the purpose of having anonymous polls.
Here's all you need to know about who voted: All the most intelligent posters who don't suffer from any developmental disorders voted for Option 3, "Expand it to 8 teams," which was the runaway leader from among the six choices given.
Coming in a distant second with Option 1, "Leave it the %#^@ alone," were the small-minded knuckleheads with a complete lack of foresight and vision who think this year "proved" that we don't need an 8-team playoff, "because there weren't even four great teams." :rolleyes: It reminds me of a running joke in my family about the response my Dad gave when my Mom proposed that we buy a waffle iron: "What do we need a waffle iron for? We never eat waffles!"
Yeah, Dad, see, um, the reason we never... oh, never mind.
The REAL geniuses, though, are the ones who voted for Option 5, "Eliminate the CFP and go back to #1 vs. #2," when we just finished a season with three unbeaten P5 conference champions!
Oops.
THIS
- Jun 19, 2014
- 21,585
- 48,397
Founding Member
- Aug 20, 2018
- 16,979
- 21,201
At least he doesn't dump on the host because their digs aren't up to your standards.
- Jun 19, 2014
- 21,585
- 48,397
Founding Member
you are such a baby
- Aug 14, 2018
- 10,768
- 20,655
- Aug 20, 2018
- 16,979
- 21,201
- Aug 20, 2018
- 16,979
- 21,201
- Jun 19, 2014
- 21,585
- 48,397
Founding Member
that's really the best you've got?I bet you do all kinds of imagining about what goes on at parties!
- Aug 28, 2014
- 16,541
- 26,097
Real men aren't afraid to share how they voted.Why, so you can harass them? Obviously once you make a poll anonymous you can't flip a switch and expose who voted for what. That would kind of defeat the purpose of having anonymous polls.
Here's all you need to know about who voted: All the most intelligent posters who don't suffer from any developmental disorders voted for Option 3, "Expand it to 8 teams," which was the runaway leader from among the six choices given.
Coming in a distant second with Option 1, "Leave it the %#^@ alone," were the small-minded knuckleheads with a complete lack of foresight and vision who think this year "proved" that we don't need an 8-team playoff, "because there weren't even four great teams." :rolleyes: It reminds me of a running joke in my family about the response my Dad gave when my Mom proposed that we buy a waffle iron: "What do we need a waffle iron for? We never eat waffles!"
Yeah, Dad, see, um, the reason we never... oh, never mind.
The REAL geniuses, though, are the ones who voted for Option 5, "Eliminate the CFP and go back to #1 vs. #2," when we just finished a season with three unbeaten P5 conference champions!
Oops.
In any case 16 pages and you still haven't made an argument where it benefits UF more than hinders.
But hey, some people are all about participation trophies.
- Jun 11, 2014
- 4,720
- 4,309
Founding Member
- Jul 16, 2018
- 7,756
- 20,369
Ha Ha! - Nelson Muntz
lizardbreath
Well-Known Member
- Nov 5, 2016
- 3,341
- 6,323
- Jun 11, 2014
- 16,720
- 16,674
Founding Member
The first two games are almost always lopsided. Expanding the playoff would only mean more beat-downs by the elite teams. 2 was enough. 4 is stupid. More is retarded. Sorry I'm old so not politically correct.
