Well the guy who wrote this maybe missed a couple of things:
1. Campbell like McElwain might have a buyout exemption list. Campbell might have been smart enough to put UF on that list. I guess we may hear about that.
2. Campbell's base compensation for coaching football is $265,000. There are 4 years left on his contract maybe his buyout in one way of looking at it $1,060,000. He has some other guaranteed money but that is for secondary services provided. It sounds like he could quite as ISU football coach pay the buyout and offer to stay on and do the coaches show or go to booster club meetings. I am not sure if ISU really wants him doing their coaches show next year if he is the UF coach, but who knows. I am sure he could do back to back shows in a studio in Gainesville, one with UF highlights and one with ISU highlights.
3. These low base salaries in coaches contracts are so the coach can be fired with only the base salary as the buy out. So I think Campbell is in play.
Dan likes that emote just a little too much.
He shows up every day and collects part of his 13 million dollar check, so technically he didn't quit. I get what you're saying but he didn't just quit today, over time he's proven he's incapable of performing his job at the level we expect. We will fire him. We are at fault for hiring him and then not firing his sorry ass sooner. There will be a negotiated buyout.I somewhat disagree. We are firing him because he did quit. He has openly shown that he can’t do this with all of the elements involved. And then he lies to make himself feel better.
People always say that teams take on the mentality of their coach. Despite any faux bravado, our team clearly quit today.
I’m in the camp that we pay him a bit but not the whole thing. Bulls and UAA need to learn from this one or we’ll just do it again.
No chance for Mullen. Strickland knows him.I do not want Mullen here. I am hoping that the booster don't like Mullen (long been rumored), and they pressure the AD not to hire him. Mullen isn't a bad coach, but the Gators can and should do a lot better than him.
Personally, I'd drop a Brinks truck off in Frost's front yard, and make him turn down all the cash. If he turns us down, I am not sure who I would go after next, but it would not be Mullen.
You have this backwards. Law is explaining it in terms of the school UF would be poaching a coach from. It is their damages.
His point is that school would be able to hire another coach. They would need a new name plate for the head coaches office. They might use a search firm. Still these costs are in the 10s of thousands of dollars, maybe six figures, but not in the millions of dollars.
More of a problem is that the school would sue the person that left not the hiring program. Still if for example McElwain had said screw you to CSU, to get huge damages they would have had to go into court and argue that McElwain was so much better than their current coach their damages from the breach were in the multiple 7 figures. I am not sure arguing in court that your current coach is much worse than your prior coach is something an athletic department wants to do.
This is true and some aspects are amorphous so the parties can agree to fix the amount but it must be reasonably related as I was saying.Just a guess but I think they could also argue that the current coach is as good as the former coach but they had to pay him more than they were paying the old coach to hire him (I.e.- due to a change in the marketplace for coaches) and therefore they suffered monetary damages.
Right even if they think they have their guy and have an unofficial agreement in principal, nothing happens soon and things can change in a flash.The only way we get a new coach named before the end of the season is obviously if its Kelly or someone else who isn't currently coaching another team. If its gonna be Frost, Campbell, etc we are just gonna have to wait about six weeks or so and watch some exhibition football until we find out.